Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26256215›Full record

ArticlePain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2015

Evaluation of Evidence-based Nursing Pain Management Practice.

Wenjia Song, Linda H Eaton, Debra B Gordon, Christine Hoyle, Ardith Z Doorenbos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The mechanism and potential therapeutic target of piezo channels in pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Benefits of using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with cancer pain: an intervention study conducted in Swedish hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Editorial Special Issue: Pain Management.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenjia SongSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Linda H EatonBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: lineaton@uw.edu.
Debra B GordonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Christine HoylePsychosocial and Community Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ardith Z DoorenbosBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
Palliative Care Symptom Management in Rural CommunitiesR01NR012450 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOORENBOS, ARDITH Z · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Applying Technology to Problems in Pain and Symptom ManagementK24NR015340 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOORENBOS, ARDITH Z · 2014 to 2018
$842k
NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015340NINR NIH HHS K24NR015340NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012450NINR NIH HHS R01NR012450NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to ensure that cancer pain management is based on the best evidence. Nursing evidence-based pain management can be examined through an evaluation of pain documentation. The aim of this study was to modify and test an evaluation tool for nursing cancer pain documentation, and describe the frequency and quality of nursing pain documentation in one oncology unit via the electronic medical system. A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for this study at an oncology unit of an academic medical center in the Pacific Northwest. Medical records were examined for 37 adults hospitalized during April and May 2013. Nursing pain documentations (N = 230) were reviewed using an evaluation tool modified from the Cancer Pain Practice Index to consist of 13 evidence-based pain management indicators, including pain assessment, care plan, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, monitoring and treatment of analgesic side effects, communication with physicians, and patient education. Individual nursing documentation was assigned a score ranging from 0 (worst possible) to 13 (best possible), to reflect the delivery of evidence-based pain management. The participating nurses documented 90% of the recommended evidence-based pain management indicators. Documentation was suboptimal for pain reassessment, pharmacologic interventions, and bowel regimen. The study results provide implications for enhancing electronic medical record design and highlight a need for future research to understand the reasons for suboptimal nursing documentation of cancer pain management. For the future use of the data evaluation tool, we recommend additional modifications according to study settings.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based NursingAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidCancer PainCross-Sectional StudiesCryotherapyDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID26256215
PMCPMC4531385
OpenAlexW1501618605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.