Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26255707›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Feeding regulates sex pheromone attraction and courtship in Drosophila females.

Sébastien Lebreton, Federica Trona, Felipe Borrero-Echeverry, Florian Bilz, Veit Grabe, Paul G Becher, Mikael A Carlsson, Dick R Nässel, Bill S Hansson, Silke Sachse and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. An integrated anatomical, functional and evolutionary view of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Attraction ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Insulin-like peptide 8 (Ilp8) regulates female fecundity in flies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. LiveInsects · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sébastien Lebreton1] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Alnarp, Sweden [2] Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Federica Trona1] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Alnarp, Sweden [2] Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Felipe Borrero-Echeverry1] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Alnarp, Sweden [2] Colombian Corporation of Agricultural Research Research CORPOICA, Biological Control Laboratory, Las Palmas 240142, Colombia.
Florian BilzDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Veit GrabeDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Paul G BecherSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Alnarp, Sweden.
Mikael A CarlssonDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dick R NässelDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Silke SachseDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Peter WitzgallSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Alnarp, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, gender-specific behavioural responses to the male-produced sex pheromone cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA) rely on sexually dimorphic, third-order neural circuits. We show that nutritional state in female flies modulates cVA perception in first-order olfactory neurons. Starvation increases, and feeding reduces attraction to food odour, in both sexes. Adding cVA to food odour, however, maintains attraction in fed females, while it has no effect in males. Upregulation of sensitivity and behavioural responsiveness to cVA in fed females is paralleled by a strong increase in receptivity to male courtship. Functional imaging of the antennal lobe (AL), the olfactory centre in the insect brain, shows that olfactory input to DA1 and VM2 glomeruli is also modulated by starvation. Knocking down insulin receptors in neurons converging onto the DA1 glomerulus suggests that insulin-signalling partly controls pheromone perception in the AL, and adjusts cVA attraction according to nutritional state and sexual receptivity in Drosophila females.

Indexed as

AcetatesAcetic AcidAnimalsBrainDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFeeding BehaviorFemaleInsulinMaleNeuronsOleic AcidsPheromonesReceptor, InsulinReceptors, OdorantRNA InterferenceAcetatesAcetic Acidcis-vaccenyl acetateDrosophila ProteinsInsulinOleic AcidsPheromonesReceptor, InsulinReceptors, OdorantRNA, Small InterferingSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID26255707
PMCPMC4530334
OpenAlexW2159782501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.