Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26255587›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2015

Structure, Dynamics, and Allosteric Potential of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor N-Terminal Domains.

James Krieger, Ivet Bahar, Ingo H Greger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tuning synaptic strength by regulation of AMPA glutamate receptor localization.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24: Ion channels.British journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James KriegerNeurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ingo H GregerNeurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: ig@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AYOOB, JOSEPH C · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Medical Research Council MC_U105174197NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are tetrameric cation channels that mediate synaptic transmission and plasticity. They have a unique modular architecture with four domains: the intracellular C-terminal domain (CTD) that is involved in synaptic targeting, the transmembrane domain (TMD) that forms the ion channel, the membrane-proximal ligand-binding domain (LBD) that binds agonists such as L-glutamate, and the distal N-terminal domain (NTD), whose function is the least clear. The extracellular portion, comprised of the LBD and NTD, is loosely arranged, mediating complex allosteric regulation and providing a rich target for drug development. Here, we briefly review recent work on iGluR NTD structure and dynamics, and further explore the allosteric potential for the NTD in AMPA-type iGluRs using coarse-grained simulations. We also investigate mechanisms underlying the established NTD allostery in NMDA-type iGluRs, as well as the fold-related metabotropic glutamate and GABAB receptors. We show that the clamshell motions intrinsically favored by the NTD bilobate fold are coupled to dimeric and higher-order rearrangements that impact the iGluR LBD and ultimately the TMD. Finally, we explore the dynamics of intact iGluRs and describe how it might affect receptor operation in a synaptic environment.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationDimerizationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMotionProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-BReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-BReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID26255587
PMCPMC4576161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.