Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26255563›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia research2015

COMT genotype and response to cognitive remediation in schizophrenia.

Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer, Anzalee Khan, Herbert Lachman, Susan R McGurk, Abraham Goldring, Amod Thanju, Saurabh Kaushik

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Analytical methodologies for sensing catechol-Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean-Pierre LindenmayerManhattan Psychiatric Center, New York, NY, United States; New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States. Electronic address: Lindenmayer@nki.rfmh.org.
Anzalee KhanManhattan Psychiatric Center, New York, NY, United States; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States; ProPhase LLC, New York, NY, United States.
Herbert LachmanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
Susan R McGurkBoston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Abraham GoldringManhattan Psychiatric Center, New York, NY, United States; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States.
Amod ThanjuManhattan Psychiatric Center, New York, NY, United States; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States.
Saurabh KaushikNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States.

Funding

COMT genotype and response to cognitive remediation in schizophreniaR03MH078098 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI LINDENMAYER, JEAN-PIERRE · 2007 to 2008
$158k
NIMH NIH HHS 1R03MH078098-01NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH078098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA functional polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene (Val158Met) partially appears to influence cognitive performance in schizophrenia subjects and healthy controls by modulating prefrontal dopaminergic activity. This study evaluated the association of the COMT Val108/158 Met genotype with response to computerized neurocognitive remediation (CRT).

method145 subjects with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were genotyped via saliva sampling. Subjects were evaluated on neurocognitive assessments (MATRICS) and clinical symptoms (PANSS) at baseline and endpoint after 12weeks of CRT. "Improvement" was defined as ≥67% of cognitive domains (≥4) showing performance increases. If ≤67% (≤2) of domains improved, the change was defined as "minimal improvement." A general linear model was conducted for change of each cognitive domain.

resultsOf 145 subjects, data from 138 subjects were usable. Distribution of COMT genotype: Met/Met: 28 (20.29%), Val/Met: 61 (44.20%), and Val/Val: 49 (35.51%). No significant differences were seen among genotype groups at baseline or across genotype group for "Improvement" vs. "Minimal Improvement." GLM analysis showed significant differences in Verbal Learning (p=0.003), Visual Learning (p=0.014) and Attention/Vigilance (p=0.011) favoring Met/Met and Val/Met groups.

conclusionsThe low activity Met allele (Met/Met; Val/Met) was associated with significantly greater improvements in the MATRICS domains of Verbal Learning, Visual Learning and Attention/Vigilance after CRT.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultAntipsychotic AgentsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPolymorphism, GeneticPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersSalivaSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanCognitive remediationCOMT genotypeSchizophreniaSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID26255563
PMCPMC4591188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.