Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26255156›Full record

ArticleSexual health2015

Engagement in group sex among geosocial networking mobile application-using men who have sex with men.

Gregory Phillips, Christian Grov, Brian Mustanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inferring Opinions and Behavioral Characteristics of Gay Men with Large Scale Multilingual Text from Blued.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frequency of Group Sex Participation and Risk for HIV/STI Among Young Adult Nightclub Scene Participants.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory PhillipsNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences, 625N. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Christian GrovDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College, City University of New York (CUNY), 2900 Bedford Avenue, New York, NY 11210, USA.
Brian MustanskiNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences, 625N. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

Efficacy of Internet-based HIV preventionR01DA035145 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM) remain the group most affected by the HIV epidemic in the United States. At least one-quarter of MSM report engagement in group sex events (GSEs), which can pose a risk for HIV transmission and acquisition. In this study, identification of event-level correlates of sexual and drug use behaviours at GSEs was sought to better inform prevention activities.

methodsFor this study, participants were recruited via banner and pop-up advertisements placed on a geosocial networking mobile phone application that MSM use to meet men.

resultsOf the 1997 individuals who completed the study screener, 36.0% reported participating in at least one GSE in the prior year. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, attendance at a GSE in the past year was significantly associated with older age, full/part time employment and being HIV positive. Of the men who attended a GSE, more than half reported condomless anal sex (CAS) with at least one of their partners (insertive: 57.7%; receptive: 56.3%). MSM who indicated drug use had significantly higher odds of having insertive CAS [odds ratio (OR)=2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-4.39] and receptive CAS (OR=3.60; 95% CI: 1.96-6.63) at their last GSE.

conclusionsThe high prevalence of HIV-positive MSM engaging in group sex, coupled with their greater odds of CAS, poses a significant risk for HIV/STI transmission within the group sex setting. More research is needed to determine patterns of condom use at these events and whether seroadaptive behaviours are driving CAS.

Identifiers

PMID26255156
PMCPMC4749466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.