Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26255070›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

A multi-resolution textural approach to diagnostic neuropathology reporting.

Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Hamza Numan Gokozan, Brad Elder, Vinay K Puduvalli, Christopher R Pierson, José Javier Otero, Metin N Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi *Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University, Jalan Multimedia, 63100 Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hamza Numan Gokozan *Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Brad ElderDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vinay K PuduvalliDivision of Neuro-oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Christopher R PiersonDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
José Javier OteroDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Metin N GurcanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Patient Oriented Research Program in Neuro-oncologyK24CA160777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PUDUVALLI, VINAY K · 2012 to 2015
$580k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA160777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a computer aided diagnostic workflow focusing on two diagnostic branch points in neuropathology (intraoperative consultation and p53 status in tumor biopsy specimens) by means of texture analysis via discrete wavelet frames decomposition. For intraoperative consultation, our methodology is capable of classifying glioblastoma versus metastatic cancer by extracting textural features from the non-nuclei region of cytologic preparations based on the imaging characteristics of glial processes, which appear as anisotropic thin linear structures. For metastasis, these are homogeneous in appearance, thus suitable and extractable texture features distinguish the two tissue types. Experiments on 53 images (29 glioblastomas and 24 metastases) resulted in average accuracy as high as 89.7 % for glioblastoma, 87.5 % for metastasis and 88.7 % overall. For p53 interpretation, we detect and classify p53 status by classifying staining intensity into strong, moderate, weak and negative sub-classes. We achieved this by developing a novel adaptive thresholding for detection, a two-step rule based on weighted color and intensity for the classification of positively and negatively stained nuclei, followed by texture classification to classify the positively stained nuclei into the strong, moderate and weak intensity sub-classes. Our detection method is able to correctly locate and distinguish the four types of cells, at 85 % average precision and 88 % average sensitivity rate. These classification methods on the other hand recorded 81 % accuracy in classifying the positive and negative cells, and 60 % accuracy in further classifying the positive cells into the three intensity groups, which is comparable with neuropathologists' markings.

Indexed as

NeuropathologyAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNeuroimagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Discrete wavelet framesGlioblastomaIntra-operative consultationMetastasisPrognostic reportingTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID26255070
PMCPMC4782607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.