Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254902›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2015

Adaptability of protein structures to enable functional interactions and evolutionary implications.

Turkan Haliloglu, Ivet Bahar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reused Protein Segments Linked to Functional Dynamics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Turkan HalilogluDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Polymer Research Center, and Center for Life Sciences and Technologies, Bogazici University, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: bahar@pitt.edu.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COMPEAU, PHILLIP EDWARD CHARLES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
TrainingU54HG008540 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BERG, JEREMY M · 2014 to 2018
$12.8M
NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Continued Development of Protein Dynamics Software ProDyR01GM099738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG008540NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies in recent years have drawn attention to the ability of proteins to adapt to intermolecular interactions by conformational changes along structure-encoded collective modes of motions. These so-called soft modes, primarily driven by entropic effects, facilitate, if not enable, functional interactions. They represent excursions on the conformational space along principal low-ascent directions/paths away from the original free energy minimum, and they are accessible to the protein even before protein-protein/ligand interactions. An emerging concept from these studies is the evolution of structures or modular domains to favor such modes of motion that will be recruited or integrated for enabling functional interactions. Structural dynamics, including the allosteric switches in conformation that are often stabilized upon formation of complexes and multimeric assemblies, emerge as key properties that are evolutionarily maintained to accomplish biological activities, consistent with the paradigm sequence→structure→dynamics→function where 'dynamics' bridges structure and function.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAllosteric RegulationMovementProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26254902
PMCPMC4688206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.