Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254801›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Test-retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire.

Wan Ling Lee, Karuthan Chinna, Awang Bulgiba, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Imran Zainal Abidin, Stefan Höfer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wan Ling LeeDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. wllee@um.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-2905
Karuthan ChinnaDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Julius Centre University of Malaya, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Awang BulgibaDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Julius Centre University of Malaya, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khatijah Lim AbdullahDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Imran Zainal AbidinDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Stefan HöferDepartment of Medical Psychology, Innsbruck Medical University, Schöpfstr. 23a, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHeart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) is a new "hybrid" developed from the MacNew and two condition-specific questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). This study investigates test-retest reliability of HeartQoL (English version) according to international criteria (e.g., COSMIN, GRRAS). Findings on HeartQoL are compared to the published data on MacNew in view that both serve as the core IHD-specific HRQoL instrument.

methodsOut of 105 patients with IHD, 76 completed self-administration of HeartQoL at the clinic followed by at home within a 2-week interval. In retest, patients responded using non-interview methods (phone messaging, email, fax, and post). Phone interviewing was reserved for non-respondents to reminder.

resultsReliability of HeartQoL was good (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.78-0.82), was supported in the Bland-Altman plot, and was comparable to five studies on MacNew of similar retest interval (MacNew-English = 0.70-0.75; translated MacNew = 0.72-0.91). Applicability of its standard error of measurement (0.20-0.25) and smallest detectable change (0.55-0.70) will depend on availability of normative data in future.

conclusionThe reliability of HeartQoL is comparable to its parent instrument, the MacNew. The HeartQoL is a potentially reliable core IHD-specific HRQoL instrument in measuring group change.

Indexed as

Health StatusSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAngina, UnstableCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart FailureHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionParentsPsychometricsQuality of LifeMeasurement agreementPatient-reported outcomeRepeatabilityReproducibilityValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.