Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254692›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Evaluation of short-interfering RNAs treatment in experimental rabies due to wild-type virus.

Camila Michele Appolinario, Susan Dora Allendorf, Marina Gea Peres, Clovis Reynaldo Fonseca, Acacia Ferreira Vicente, João Marcelo Azevedo de Paula Antunes, José Carlos Figueiredo Pantoja, Jane Megid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camila Michele AppolinarioDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Susan Dora AllendorfDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Marina Gea PeresDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Clovis Reynaldo FonsecaDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Acacia Ferreira VicenteDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
João Marcelo Azevedo de Paula AntunesDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
José Carlos Figueiredo PantojaDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Jane MegidDepartamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (DHVSP-FMVZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: jane@fmvz.unesp.br.
Fundação de Estudo e Pesquisa em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have evaluated the efficacy of short-interfering RNAs targeting the nucleoprotein gene and also the brain immune response in treated and non-treated infected mice. Mice were inoculated with wild-type virus, classified as dog (hv2) or vampire bat (hv3) variants and both groups were treated or left as controls. No difference was observed in the lethality rate between treated and non-treated groups, although clinical evaluation of hv2 infected mice showed differences in the severity of clinical disease (p=0.0006). Evaluation of brain immune response 5 days post-inoculation in treated hv2 group showed no difference among the analyzed genes, whereas after 10 days post-inoculation there was increased expression of 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 12, interferon gamma, and C-X-C motif chemokine 10 associated with higher expression of N gene in the same period (p<0.0001). In hv2 non-treated group only higher interferon beta expression was found at day 5. The observed differences in results of the immune response genes between treated and non-treated groups is not promising as they had neither impact on mortality nor even a reduction in the expression of N gene in siRNA treated animals. This finding suggests that the use of pre-designed siRNA alone may not be useful in rabies treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsBrainCell LineChiropteraDisease Models, AnimalDogsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRabiesRabies virusReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Small InterferingVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsRNA, Small InterferingBat virusDog virusRabiessiRNA

Identifiers

PMID26254692
PMCPMC9427455
OpenAlexW1664705336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.