ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2015
Time domain DNP with the NOVEL sequence.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-frequency dynamic nuclear polarization in rotating solids.Science advances · 2026Review
- Stable electron-irradiated [1-Science advances · 2025Article
- Dynamic nuclear polarization and chemically induced hyperpolarization: Progress, mechanisms, and opportunities.Magnetic resonance letters · 2025Review
- Pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization: a comprehensive Floquet description.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
- High-frequency high-power DNP/EPR spectrometer operating at 7 T magnetic field.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2024Article
- Large cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarisation enhancements with kilowatt inverting chirped pulses at 94 GHz.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Polarizing agents for efficient high field DNP solid-state NMR spectroscopy under magic-angle spinning: from design principles to formulation strategies.Chemical science · 2023Review
- Coherent Dynamic Nuclear Polarization using Chirped Pulses.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Spin Hyperpolarization in Modern Magnetic Resonance.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Non-perturbative treatment of the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023Article
- Observing Nearby Nuclei on Paramagnetic Trityls and MOFs via DNP and Electron Decoupling.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Article
- Designing broadband pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization sequences in static solids.Science advances · 2022Article
- Integrated, Stretched, and Adiabatic Solid Effects.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Reverse dynamic nuclear polarisation for indirect detection of nuclear spins close to unpaired electrons.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2022Article
- DNPSOUP: A simulation software package for dynamic nuclear polarization.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022Review
- Time domain DNP at 1.2 T.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2021Article
- Solid State NMR Spectroscopy a Valuable Technique for Structural Insights of Advanced Thin Film Materials: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Solid-state NMR spectroscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021Article
- Adiabatic Solid Effect.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2020Article
- High frequency dynamic nuclear polarization: New directions for the 21st century.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present results of a pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) study at 0.35 T (9.7 GHz/14.7 MHz for electron/(1)H Larmor frequency) using a lab frame-rotating frame cross polarization experiment that employs electron spin locking fields that match the (1)H nuclear Larmor frequency, the so called NOVEL (nuclear orientation via electron spin locking) condition. We apply the method to a series of DNP samples including a single crystal of diphenyl nitroxide (DPNO) doped benzophenone (BzP), 1,3-bisdiphenylene-2-phenylallyl (BDPA) doped polystyrene (PS), and sulfonated-BDPA (SA-BDPA) doped glycerol/water glassy matrices. The optimal Hartman-Hahn matching condition is achieved when the nutation frequency of the electron matches the Larmor frequency of the proton, ω(1S) = ω(0I), together with possible higher order matching conditions at lower efficiencies. The magnetization transfer from electron to protons occurs on the time scale of ∼100 ns, consistent with the electron-proton couplings on the order of 1-10 MHz in these samples. In a fully protonated single crystal DPNO/BzP, at 270 K, we obtained a maximum signal enhancement of ε = 165 and the corresponding gain in sensitivity of ε(T1/T(B))(1/2)=230 due to the reduction in the buildup time under DNP. In a sample of partially deuterated PS doped with BDPA, we obtained an enhancement of 323 which is a factor of ∼3.2 higher compared to the protonated version of the same sample and accounts for 49% of the theoretical limit. For the SA-BDPA doped glycerol/water glassy matrix at 80 K, the sample condition used in most applications of DNP in nuclear magnetic resonance, we also observed a significant enhancement. Our findings demonstrate that pulsed DNP via the NOVEL sequence is highly efficient and can potentially surpass continuous wave DNP mechanisms such as the solid effect and cross effect which scale unfavorably with increasing magnetic field. Furthermore, pulsed DNP is also a promising avenue for DNP at high temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.