Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254570›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2015

Influence of Internal DNA Pressure on Stability and Infectivity of Phage λ.

D W Bauer, A Evilevitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D W BauerCarnegie Mellon University Department of Physics, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
A EvilevitchCarnegie Mellon University Department of Physics, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Lund University Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: alexe@cmu.edu.

Funding

Training in the Molecular Biophysics and Structural BiologyT32GM088119 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HINCK, ANDREW P · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM088119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses must remain infectious while in harsh extracellular environments. An important aspect of viral particle stability for double-stranded DNA viruses is the energetically unfavorable state of the tightly confined DNA chain within the virus capsid creating pressures of tens of atmospheres. Here, we study the influence of internal genome pressure on the thermal stability of viral particles. Using differential scanning calorimetry to monitor genome loss upon heating, we find that internal pressure destabilizes the virion, resulting in a smaller activation energy barrier to trigger DNA release. These experiments are complemented by plaque assay and electron microscopy measurements to determine the influence of intra-capsid DNA pressure on the rates of viral infectivity loss. At higher temperatures (65-75°C), failure to retain the packaged genome is the dominant mechanism of viral inactivation. Conversely, at lower temperatures (40-55°C), a separate inactivation mechanism dominates, which results in non-infectious particles that still retain their packaged DNA. Most significantly, both mechanisms of infectivity loss are directly influenced by internal DNA pressure, with higher pressure resulting in a more rapid rate of inactivation at all temperatures.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage lambdaCalorimetry, Differential ScanningCapsidCapsid ProteinsDNA PackagingDNA, ViralGenome, ViralHot TemperaturePressureVirus AssemblyVirus InactivationCapsid ProteinsDNA, Viralcapsid stabilitydifferential scanning calorimetryDNA pressureinfectivityphage lambda

Identifiers

PMID26254570
PMCPMC5040123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.