Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254486›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Population Genomics of Infectious and Integrated Wolbachia pipientis Genomes in Drosophila ananassae.

Jae Young Choi, Jaclyn E Bubnell, Charles F Aquadro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetics · 2019
    Article
  15. TheGenetics · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Young ChoiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University jc2439@cornell.edu.
Jaclyn E BubnellDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Charles F AquadroDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Cornell University · USPediatrics and Genetics · US

Funding

Adaptive Protein Evolution of the Drosophila Germline Stem Cell Gene Bag of MarblesR01GM095793 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 2011 to 2024
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095793NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM095793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coevolution between Drosophila and its endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis has many intriguing aspects. For example, Drosophila ananassae hosts two forms of W. pipientis genomes: One being the infectious bacterial genome and the other integrated into the host nuclear genome. Here, we characterize the infectious and integrated genomes of W. pipientis infecting D. ananassae (wAna), by genome sequencing 15 strains of D. ananassae that have either the infectious or integrated wAna genomes. Results indicate evolutionarily stable maternal transmission for the infectious wAna genome suggesting a relatively long-term coevolution with its host. In contrast, the integrated wAna genome showed pseudogene-like characteristics accumulating many variants that are predicted to have deleterious effects if present in an infectious bacterial genome. Phylogenomic analysis of sequence variation together with genotyping by polymerase chain reaction of large structural variations indicated several wAna variants among the eight infectious wAna genomes. In contrast, only a single wAna variant was found among the seven integrated wAna genomes examined in lines from Africa, south Asia, and south Pacific islands suggesting that the integration occurred once from a single infectious wAna genome and then spread geographically. Further analysis revealed that for all D. ananassae we examined with the integrated wAna genomes, the majority of the integrated wAna genomic regions is represented in at least two copies suggesting a double integration or single integration followed by an integrated genome duplication. The possible evolutionary mechanism underlying the widespread geographical presence of the duplicate integration of the wAna genome is an intriguing question remaining to be answered.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialAnimalsDrosophilaFemaleGenome, MitochondrialGenomicsHeterozygotePolymorphism, GeneticSequence AlignmentWolbachiaendosymbionthorizontal gene transferlateral gene transferwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26254486
PMCPMC4558871
OpenAlexW2099650210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.