ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2016
Algorithms for modeling global and context-specific functional relationship networks.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in gene function prediction using context-specific coexpression networks in plants.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional genomics has enormous potential to facilitate our understanding of normal and disease-specific physiology. In the past decade, intensive research efforts have been focused on modeling functional relationship networks, which summarize the probability of gene co-functionality relationships. Such modeling can be based on either expression data only or heterogeneous data integration. Numerous methods have been deployed to infer the functional relationship networks, while most of them target the global (non-context-specific) functional relationship networks. However, it is expected that functional relationships consistently reprogram under different tissues or biological processes. Thus, advanced methods have been developed targeting tissue-specific or developmental stage-specific networks. This article brings together the state-of-the-art functional relationship network modeling methods, emphasizes the need for heterogeneous genomic data integration and context-specific network modeling and outlines future directions for functional relationship networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.