Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254424›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2015

Coming to terms with tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in the lung.

Y S Prakash, Daniel J Tschumperlin, Kurt R Stenmark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancements in lung regeneration: from bench to bedside.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Investigating Matrix-Fibroblast Regulation of MicroRNAs. A Dice(r)y Proposition.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y S PrakashDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Prakash.ys@mayo.edu.
Daniel J TschumperlinDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and.
Kurt R StenmarkDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

VRAC and Rho in pulmonary EC proliferationP01HL014985 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STENMARK, KURT R. · 1985 to 2019
$35.1M
NEURAL REGULATION OF AIRWAYS DURING POSTNATAL MATURATIONR01HL056470 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PRAKASH, Y. S. · 1996 to 2025
$10.5M
Mechanobiology of Lung FibrosisR01HL092961 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Daniel J. Tschumperlin · 2009 to 2026
$8.0M
Neurotrophins in the LungR01HL088029 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PRAKASH, Y. S. · 2009 to 2022
$5.9M
Fibroblasts and Mononuclear Fibrogenic Cells Drive Right Ventricular Pulmonary ArR01HL114887 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BULL, TODD M, BUTTRICK, PETER N. · 2012 to 2016
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-088029NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL-014985NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL014985NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL-056470NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL-092961NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092961NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL-114887NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung diseases such as emphysema, interstitial fibrosis, and pulmonary vascular diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality, but despite substantial mechanistic understanding, clinical management options for them are limited, with lung transplantation being implemented at end stages. However, limited donor lung availability, graft rejection, and long-term problems after transplantation are major hurdles to lung transplantation being a panacea. Bioengineering the lung is an exciting and emerging solution that has the ultimate aim of generating lung tissues and organs for transplantation. In this article we capture and review the current state of the art in lung bioengineering, from the multimodal approaches, to creating anatomically appropriate lung scaffolds that can be recellularized to eventually yield functioning, transplant-ready lungs. Strategies for decellularizing mammalian lungs to create scaffolds with native extracellular matrix components vs. de novo generation of scaffolds using biocompatible materials are discussed. Strengths vs. limitations of recellularization using different cell types of various pluripotency such as embryonic, mesenchymal, and induced pluripotent stem cells are highlighted. Current hurdles to guide future research toward achieving the clinical goal of transplantation of a bioengineered lung are discussed.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisLungLung DiseasesTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansRegenerative MedicineStem CellsTissue Engineeringbioengineeringdecellularizationpulmonarytissue engineeringtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID26254424
PMCPMC4593835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.