Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254312›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2015

Genome Biology and the Evolution of Cell-Size Diversity.

Rachel Lockridge Mueller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome size evolution and phenotypic correlates in the poison frog family Dendrobatidae.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Polyploidy and mTOR signaling: a possible molecular link.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Organelle size scaling over embryonic development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biological Scaling Problems and Solutions in Amphibians.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  13. The Influence of Genome and Cell Size on Brain Morphology in Amphibians.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rachel Lockridge MuellerDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1878.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell size is highly variable among different species across the Tree of Life. For decades, biologists have generated hypotheses to explain this variation, in many cases, drawing on the correlations that exist among cell size, genome size, nucleus size, and various physiological and developmental parameters. In recent years, our understanding of the molecular processes that generate variation in genome size over evolutionary time, as well as the processes that maintain homeostasis in cell size over ontogenetic time, has increased dramatically. The goal of this article is to highlight how information from these fields can be integrated to generate new hypotheses to explain cell-size diversity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell SizeGenome SizeModels, GeneticEnergy MetabolismSelection, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26254312
PMCPMC4632665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.