Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254112›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage2015

Co-activation based parcellation of the human frontal pole.

K L Ray, D H Zald, S Bludau, M C Riedel, D Bzdok, J Yanes, K E Falcone, K Amunts, P T Fox, S B Eickhoff and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Subspecialization within default mode nodes characterized in 10,000 UK Biobank participants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

K L RayResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
D H ZaldDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
S BludauInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
M C RiedelResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
D BzdokInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Parietal Team, INRIA, NeuroSpin, Bat 145, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; NeuroSpin, CEA, Bat 145, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
J YanesDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
K E FalconeDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
K AmuntsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
P T FoxResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA; Research Service, South Texas Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA; State Key Laboratory for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
S B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
A R LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: alaird@fiu.edu.
Florida International University · USForschungszentrum Jülich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HKVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
BrainMap Tracker: Automated Annotation of Brain Mapping ExperimentsR56MH097870 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI LAIRD, ANGELA R, TURNER, JESS · 2012 to 2013
$1.1M
Development of a Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: BrainMap and BIRN IntergrationR01MH084812 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON, TURNER, JESS · 2009 to 2011
$869k
Meta-analysis in human brain mappingR56MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2020 to 2020
$543k
NIMH NIH HHS MH074457NIMH NIH HHS MH084812NIMH NIH HHS MH097870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084812NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH097870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, the human frontal pole (FP) has been considered as a single architectonic area. Brodmann's area 10 is located in the frontal lobe with known contributions in the execution of various higher order cognitive processes. However, recent cytoarchitectural studies of the FP in humans have shown that this portion of cortex contains two distinct cytoarchitectonic regions. Since architectonic differences are accompanied by differential connectivity and functions, the frontal pole qualifies as a candidate region for exploratory parcellation into functionally discrete sub-regions. We investigated whether this functional heterogeneity is reflected in distinct segregations within cytoarchitectonically defined FP-areas using meta-analytic co-activation based parcellation (CBP). The CBP method examined the co-activation patterns of all voxels within the FP as reported in functional neuroimaging studies archived in the BrainMap database. Voxels within the FP were subsequently clustered into sub-regions based on the similarity of their respective meta-analytically derived co-activation maps. Performing this CBP analysis on the FP via k-means clustering produced a distinct 3-cluster parcellation for each hemisphere corresponding to previously identified cytoarchitectural differences. Post-hoc functional characterization of clusters via BrainMap metadata revealed that lateral regions of the FP mapped to memory and emotion domains, while the dorso- and ventromedial clusters were associated broadly with emotion and social cognition processes. Furthermore, the dorsomedial regions contain an emphasis on theory of mind and affective related paradigms whereas ventromedial regions couple with reward tasks. Results from this study support previous segregations of the FP and provide meta-analytic contributions to the ongoing discussion of elucidating functional architecture within human FP.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisCognitionEmotionsFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysPositron-Emission TomographyBrainMapCo-activationsConnectivity-based parcellationFrontal lobeFrontal poleMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID26254112
PMCPMC4626376
OpenAlexW1846923192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.