Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26254008›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics2015

QPROT: Statistical method for testing differential expression using protein-level intensity data in label-free quantitative proteomics.

Hyungwon Choi, Sinae Kim, Damian Fermin, Chih-Chiang Tsou, Alexey I Nesvizhskii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proteomic Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyungwon Choi *Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore.
Sinae Kim *Department of Biostatistics, Rutgers University.
Damian Fermin *Department of Pathology, Yale University.
Chih-Chiang TsouDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School.
Alexey I NesvizhskiiDepartments of Pathology and Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School.

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED INTERACTOME DATAR01GM094231 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 2010 to 2026
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094231NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM-094231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce QPROT, a statistical framework and computational tool for differential protein expression analysis using protein intensity data. QPROT is an extension of the QSPEC suite, originally developed for spectral count data, adapted for the analysis using continuously measured protein-level intensity data. QPROT offers a new intensity normalization procedure and model-based differential expression analysis, both of which account for missing data. Determination of differential expression of each protein is based on the standardized Z-statistic based on the posterior distribution of the log fold change parameter, guided by the false discovery rate estimated by a well-known Empirical Bayes method. We evaluated the classification performance of QPROT using the quantification calibration data from the clinical proteomic technology assessment for cancer (CPTAC) study and a recently published Escherichia coli benchmark dataset, with evaluation of FDR accuracy in the latter. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: QPROT is a statistical framework with computational software tool for comparative quantitative proteomics analysis. It features various extensions of QSPEC method originally built for spectral count data analysis, including probabilistic treatment of missing values in protein intensity data. With the increasing popularity of label-free quantitative proteomics data, the proposed method and accompanying software suite will be immediately useful for many proteomics laboratories. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Computational Proteomics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalAmino Acid SequenceComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence DataProteomeSequence Analysis, ProteinStaining and LabelingProteomeContinuously normalized spectral countsDifferential expressionIntensityMissing data

Identifiers

PMID26254008
PMCPMC4630079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.