ReviewBiochimie2015
The history of the CATH structural classification of protein domains.
Review in Biochimie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal and Lineage-Specific Patterns in the Distribution of ECOD Domain Homology Groups Across Superkingdoms.Proteins · 2026Article
- ZEB2 Gene Pathogenic Variants Across Protein-Coding Regions and Impact on Clinical Manifestations: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Proteomic analysis of the sponge Aggregation Factor implicates an ancient toolkit for allorecognition and adhesion in animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Article
- Extending the Horizon of Homology Detection with Coevolution-based Structure Prediction.Journal of molecular biology · 2021Review
- Protein Structure Prediction: Conventional and Deep Learning Perspectives.The protein journal · 2021Review
- Article
- The role of local versus nonlocal physicochemical restraints in determining protein native structure.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021Review
- Expanded analyses of the functional correlations within structural classifications of glycoside hydrolases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Deciphering the functional role of hypothetical proteins fromMolecular biology research communications · 2020Article
- The Urfold: Structural similarity just above the superfold level?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Article
- Protodomains: Symmetry-Related Supersecondary Structures in Proteins and Self-Complementarity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Automated shape-based clustering of 3D immunoglobulin protein structures in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Applying graph theory to protein structures: an Atlas of coiled coils.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- ProLego: tool for extracting and visualizing topological modules in protein structures.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Evolution of intrinsic disorder in eukaryotic proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Chopping and Changing: the Evolution of the Flavin-dependent Monooxygenases.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a historical review of the protein structure classification database CATH. Together with the SCOP database, CATH remains comprehensive and reasonably up-to-date with the now more than 100,000 protein structures in the PDB. We review the expansion of the CATH and SCOP resources to capture predicted domain structures in the genome sequence data and to provide information on the likely functions of proteins mediated by their constituent domains. The establishment of comprehensive function annotation resources has also meant that domain families can be functionally annotated allowing insights into functional divergence and evolution within protein families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.