Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253679›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Circulation of Coxiella burnetii in a Naturally Infected Flock of Dairy Sheep: Shedding Dynamics, Environmental Contamination, and Genotype Diversity.

A Joulié, K Laroucau, X Bailly, M Prigent, P Gasqui, E Lepetitcolin, B Blanchard, E Rousset, K Sidi-Boumedine, E Jourdain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular detection ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pre-purchase screening forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Two Years afterAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Surveillance ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Impact ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  17. Comparison ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. MonitoringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  19. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A JouliéFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research, UR0346 Animal Epidemiology Unit, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France VetAgro Sup Veterinary Campus, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
K LaroucauAnses, Laboratory of Maisons-Alfort, Bacterial Zoonosis Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
X BaillyFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research, UR0346 Animal Epidemiology Unit, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France.
M PrigentAnses, Laboratory of Sophia-Antipolis, Animal Q Fever Unit, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
P GasquiFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research, UR0346 Animal Epidemiology Unit, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France.
E LepetitcolinUnicor, Millau, France.
B BlanchardAdiagene, Saint Brieuc, France.
E RoussetAnses, Laboratory of Sophia-Antipolis, Animal Q Fever Unit, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
K Sidi-BoumedineAnses, Laboratory of Sophia-Antipolis, Animal Q Fever Unit, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
E JourdainFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research, UR0346 Animal Epidemiology Unit, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France elsa.jourdain@clermont.inra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii. Domestic ruminants are considered to be the main reservoir. Sheep, in particular, may frequently cause outbreaks in humans. Because within-flock circulation data are essential to implementing optimal management strategies, we performed a follow-up study of a naturally infected flock of dairy sheep. We aimed to (i) describe C. burnetii shedding dynamics by sampling vaginal mucus, feces, and milk, (ii) assess circulating strain diversity, and (iii) quantify barn environmental contamination. For 8 months, we sampled vaginal mucus and feces every 3 weeks from aborting and nonaborting ewes (n=11 and n=26, respectively); for lactating females, milk was obtained as well. We also sampled vaginal mucus from nine ewe lambs. Dust and air samples were collected every 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. All samples were screened using real-time PCR, and strongly positive samples were further analyzed using quantitative PCR. Vaginal and fecal samples with sufficient bacterial burdens were then genotyped by multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) using 17 markers. C. burnetii burdens were higher in vaginal mucus and feces than in milk, and they peaked in the first 3 weeks postabortion or postpartum. Primiparous females and aborting females tended to shed C. burnetii longer and have higher bacterial burdens than nonaborting and multiparous females. Six genotype clusters were identified; they were independent of abortion status, and within-individual genotype diversity was observed. C. burnetii was also detected in air and dust samples. Further studies should determine whether the within-flock circulation dynamics observed here are generalizable.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoxiella burnetiiGenotypeQ FeverReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSheepSheep Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26253679
PMCPMC4579427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.