Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253622›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2015

Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men.

Sue Wilson, Astrid-Maria Højer, Jeppe Buchberg, Johan Areberg, David J Nutt

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep.Current psychiatry reports · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sue WilsonCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK sue.wilson@imperial.ac.uk.
Astrid-Maria HøjerLundbeck A/S, Clinical and Quantitative Pharmacology, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.
Jeppe BuchbergLundbeck A/S, Clinical and Quantitative Pharmacology, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.
Johan ArebergLundbeck A/S, Clinical and Quantitative Pharmacology, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.
David J NuttCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the effect of vortioxetine, paroxetine and placebo after three days of dosing on sleep architecture. This was a randomised, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in 24 healthy young men. Subjects received 20mg vortioxetine, 40 mg vortioxetine, 20mg paroxetine or placebo for three consecutive days in four different periods with at least three weeks between them. Polysomnography and blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on the pre-dose night and nights 1 and 3 of dosing in each period. Plasma concentrations of vortioxetine and paroxetine during the polysomnography measurement were used to estimate SERT occupancies using published relationships in healthy subjects.All three active treatments significantly increased REM onset latency and decreased time spent in REM sleep. In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics analysis significant relationships were found between REM onset latency and time spent in REM sleep and vortioxetine/paroxetine exposure. The relation between REM suppression parameters and SERT occupancy was significantly different between vortioxetine and paroxetine, despite the same SERT occupancy. This indicates that vortioxetine has a different clinical pharmacological profile from paroxetine, which may explain the differences in adverse effect profile of the two drugs, for instance the lower incidence of nausea, weight gain and sexual dysfunction with vortioxetine.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleParoxetinePiperazinesPolysomnographySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSleep, REMSulfidesVortioxetineYoung AdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationParoxetinePiperazinesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSulfidesVortioxetineserotoninSleepvortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID26253622
PMCPMC4579403
OpenAlexW1950766505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.