Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253546›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Prediction of Plant Height in Arabidopsis thaliana Using DNA Methylation Data.

Yaodong Hu, Gota Morota, Guilherme J M Rosa, Daniel Gianola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic Changes Occurring in Plant Inbreeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Diversifying maize genomic selection models.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yaodong HuDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 yhu32@wisc.edu.
Gota MorotaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583.
Guilherme J M RosaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Daniel GianolaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of complex traits using molecular genetic information is an active area in quantitative genetics research. In the postgenomic era, many types of -omic (e.g., transcriptomic, epigenomic, methylomic, and proteomic) data are becoming increasingly available. Therefore, evaluating the utility of this massive amount of information in prediction of complex traits is of interest. DNA methylation, the covalent change of a DNA molecule without affecting its underlying sequence, is one quantifiable form of epigenetic modification. We used methylation information for predicting plant height (PH) in Arabidopsis thaliana nonparametrically, using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) regression. Also, we used different criteria for selecting smaller sets of probes, to assess how representative probes could be used in prediction instead of using all probes, which may lessen computational burden and lower experimental costs. Methylation information was used for describing epigenetic similarities between individuals through a kernel matrix, and the performance of predicting PH using this similarity matrix was reasonably good. The predictive correlation reached 0.53 and the same value was attained when only preselected probes were used for prediction. We created a kernel that mimics the genomic relationship matrix in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (G-BLUP) and estimated that, in this particular data set, epigenetic variation accounted for 65% of the phenotypic variance. Our results suggest that methylation information can be useful in whole-genome prediction of complex traits and that it may help to enhance understanding of complex traits when epigenetics is under examination.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticPhenotypeProteomicsQuantitative Trait LociDNA methylationepigeneticsMeDIP-Chipphenotypic predictionRKHS regression; GenPred; shared data resource

Identifiers

PMID26253546
PMCPMC4596684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.