Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253441›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2015

[Imaging-based indications for interventional treatment of stroke].

J Fiehler, G Thomalla

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J FiehlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. fiehler@uke.de.
G ThomallaKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indications for mechanical thrombectomy are based on a proximal vessel occlusion in the absence of extensive ischemic damage in the corresponding dependent vascular territory. The maximum extent of early ischemic edema for which endovascular treatment is still useful is not clear from the studies. A benefit of mechanical thrombectomy can be safely assumed with an ASPECT score of 6-10, possibly also with lower scores. A more complex imaging with assessment of the status of collateral vessels or perfusion abnormality is scientifically interesting but usually not necessary for clinical decision-making for endovascular stroke treatment within the first 6 h after symptom onset.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMechanical ThrombolysisPatient SelectionStrokeSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingMechanical thrombectomyStrokeThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID26253441
OpenAlexW1235018872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.