Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253131›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Real-time prediction of inpatient length of stay for discharge prioritization.

Sean Barnes, Eric Hamrock, Matthew Toerper, Sauleh Siddiqui, Scott Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Development of Multiservice Machine Learning Models to Predict Postsurgical Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition at the Time of Case Posting.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The prediction of hospital length of stay using unstructured data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Observational
  19. Predicting next-day discharge via electronic health record access logs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean BarnesDepartment of Decision, Operations & Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, 4352 Van Munching Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA sbarnes@rhsmith.umd.edu.
Eric HamrockDepartment of Operations Integration, Johns Hopkins Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew ToerperDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sauleh SiddiquiDepartments of Civil Engineering and Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Johns Hopkins Systems Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott LevinDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins Systems Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHospitals are challenged to provide timely patient care while maintaining high resource utilization. This has prompted hospital initiatives to increase patient flow and minimize nonvalue added care time. Real-time demand capacity management (RTDC) is one such initiative whereby clinicians convene each morning to predict patients able to leave the same day and prioritize their remaining tasks for early discharge. Our objective is to automate and improve these discharge predictions by applying supervised machine learning methods to readily available health information. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors use supervised machine learning methods to predict patients' likelihood of discharge by 2 p.m. and by midnight each day for an inpatient medical unit. Using data collected over 8000 patient stays and 20 000 patient days, the predictive performance of the model is compared to clinicians using sensitivity, specificity, Youden's Index (i.e., sensitivity + specificity - 1), and aggregate accuracy measures.

resultsThe model compared to clinician predictions demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (P < .01), lower specificity (P < .01), and a comparable Youden Index (P > .10). Early discharges were less predictable than midnight discharges. The model was more accurate than clinicians in predicting the total number of daily discharges and capable of ranking patients closest to future discharge.

conclusionsThere is potential to use readily available health information to predict daily patient discharges with accuracies comparable to clinician predictions. This approach may be used to automate and support daily RTDC predictions aimed at improving patient flow.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationLength of StayMachine LearningPatient DischargeAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMarylandMiddle AgedWorkflowWorkloadlength of staymachine learningoperational forecastingpatient flow

Identifiers

PMID26253131
PMCPMC4954620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.