Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26253122›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2016

Physician and other healthcare personnel responses to hospital stroke quality of care performance feedback: a qualitative study.

Joseph S Ross, Linda Williams, Teresa M Damush, Marianne Matthias

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph S RossInternal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Linda WilliamsHSRD, Roudeubush VAMC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Teresa M DamushNeurology, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA Neurology, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Marianne MatthiasNeurology, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Impact of Publicity Reporting Hospital Outcome Measures for Older AdultsK08AG032886 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSS, JOSEPH SOLOMON · 2008 to 2012
$738k
HSRD VA IP1 HX001994NIA NIH HHS K08 AG032886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how physicians and other healthcare personnel respond to hospital performance feedback initiatives may have important implications for quality improvement efforts. Our objective was to explore responses to the inaugural feedback of hospital performance on stroke quality of care measures among relevant physicians and personnel at the US Department of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals.

methodsQualitative interviews with hospital administrators, physicians, nurses and quality managers at 12 VHA hospitals in the USA after the inaugural national release of the report on quality of acute stroke care processes. Interview transcripts were analysed using an immersion/crystallisation approach to identify recurrent themes.

resultsInterviews were completed with 41 individuals at 12 VHA hospitals from diverse regions of the USA; the majority were clinicians, either physicians or nurses, and nearly all had 20 years of experience or more. Interviewees described general perceptions of internal performance feedback that were both positive and negative, such as the notion that performance feedback could provide value to clinicians and hospitals, but at the same time voiced concerns about being inundated with such data. Interviewees also expressed scepticism about public reporting of performance data, citing numerous concerns and limitations. However, when interviewees described specific experiences with performance feedback, nearly all reactions were positive, including excitement, interest and feeling validated about a job well done. DISCUSSION: Physicians and other healthcare personnel described hospital performance feedback on stroke quality of care measures to be broadly valuable but identified areas of concern related to the measurement process and public reporting.

Indexed as

FeedbackHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicPhysiciansQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareStrokeHealthcare quality improvementPerformance measuresQualitative researchQuality measurement

Identifiers

PMID26253122
PMCPMC12293210
OpenAlexW2339310610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.