Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26252744›Full record

ReviewFly2015

The mysterious multi-modal repellency of DEET.

Matthew DeGennaro

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fly, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. eLife · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mosquitoes do not Like Bitter.Journal of chemical ecology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Insects · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew DeGennaroa Biomolecular Sciences Institute & Department of Biological Sciences ; Florida International University ; Miami , FL USA.
Florida International University · US

Funding

Identifying mosquito receptors that detect human odorK22AI112585 · NIAID · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI DEGENNARO, MATTHEW · 2015 to 2016
$268k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI112585NIAID NIH HHS K22AI112585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DEET is the most effective insect repellent available and has been widely used for more than half a century. Here, I review what is known about the olfactory and contact mechanisms of DEET repellency. For mosquitoes, DEET has at least two molecular targets: Odorant Receptors (ORs) mediate the effect of DEET at a distance, while unknown chemoreceptors mediate repellency upon contact. Additionally, the ionotropic receptor Ir40a has recently been identified as a putative DEET chemosensor in Drosophila. The mechanism of how DEET manipulates these molecular targets to induce insect avoidance in the vapor phase is also contested. Two hypotheses are the most likely: DEET activates an innate olfactory neural circuit leading to avoidance of hosts (smell and avoid hypothesis) or DEET has no behavioral effect on its own, but instead acts cooperatively with host odors to drive repellency (confusant hypothesis). Resolving this mystery will inform the search for a new generation of insect repellents.

Indexed as

AnimalsDEETHumansInsect RepellentsSmellTasteDEETInsect RepellentschemosensationconfusantDEETIr40akairomonemosquitoolfactionOrcoreceptorsrepellent

Identifiers

PMID26252744
PMCPMC4594586
OpenAlexW1842503298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.