Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26252518›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Metastases Show Decreased ER-Alpha and PR-A Expression Compared to Matched Primary Tumors.

Carla Bartosch, Sara Monteiro-Reis, Renata Vieira, Armindo Pereira, Marta Rodrigues, Carmen Jerónimo, José M Lopes

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Isoform specificity of progesterone receptor antibodies.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeting metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla BartoschDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal; Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of Portuguese Oncology Institute- Porto, Porto, Portugal; Medical Faculty, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sara Monteiro-ReisDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal; Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of Portuguese Oncology Institute- Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Renata VieiraDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Armindo PereiraDepartment of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São Joao, Porto, Portugal.
Marta RodriguesDepartment of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São Joao, Porto, Portugal.
Carmen JerónimoCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of Portuguese Oncology Institute- Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar-ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
José M LopesMedical Faculty, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São Joao, Porto, Portugal; IPATIMUP, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Porto, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar do Porto · PTInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) that present with advanced primary disease and develop recurrences have a poor outcome. The phenotype of EEC metastases and recurrences is poorly studied. We evaluated the morphological features and ER-alpha/PRA/p53 immunohistochemical expression of a sample of 45 EEC metastases compared to matched primary tumors. Additionally, we studied methylation levels of ER-alpha/PRA gene promoters. The distribution of histological FIGO grade was significantly different in metastases, which disclosed higher grade than primary tumors (p = 0.005). Mitotic index was significantly lower in metastases compared to matched primary tumors (p<0.001). ER-alpha (p = 0.002) and PRA (p<0.001) median H-scores were significantly lower in metastases than in matched primary EECs, but there was no significant difference concerning p53 expression (p = 0.056). ER-alpha/PRA expression differences did not correlate with differences in metastases morphology. ER-alpha/PRA gene promoter levels were globally low (range: 0% to 11.9%). One case showed higher ER-alpha gene promoter methylation in metastasis compared to matched EEC primary tumor. Regarding PRA, there was a significant higher frequency of its promotor methylation in metastases compared to primary tumors (51.6% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.022). In conclusion, EEC metastatic disease displays phenotypic changes along with ER-alpha and PRA decreased expression compared to primary tumors. ER-alpha and PRA gene promoter methylation seems to play a limited role in the etiology of these alterations. PR expression assessment for hormonal treatment decision of patients with advanced tumors, may be more adequate in metastases than in EEC primary tumors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidDNA MethylationEndometrial NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPromoter Regions, GeneticReceptors, ProgesteroneTumor Suppressor Protein p53ESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaReceptors, ProgesteroneTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26252518
PMCPMC4529229
OpenAlexW1896034315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.