Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26252436›Full record

SynthesisCancer nursing

A Systematic Review of the Symptom Distress Scale in Advanced Cancer Studies.

Stephen J Stapleton, Janean Holden, Joel Epstein, Diana J Wilkie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04069494 (Descriptors and Predictors of Burden and Information Needs on Symptom Self-management in Thai Patients With Lung Cancer and Their Family Caregivers During Palliative Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04069494 completednot on this map

Descriptors and Predictors of Burden and Information Needs on Symptom Self-management in Thai Patients With Lung Cancer and Their Family Caregivers During Palliative Radiotherapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChulabhorn Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled112ConditionsAdvanced Lung Cancer, SymptomsArmsquestionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AMTRA: a multicentered experience of a web-based monitoring and tailored toxicity management system for cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen J StapletonAuthor Affiliations: Mennonite College of Nursing at Illinois State University, Normal (Dr Stapleton); School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Holden); Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Dr Epstein); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainsville (Dr Wilkie).
Janean Holden
Joel Epstein
Diana J Wilkie

Funding

Nursing and Health Research Informatics CoreP30NR010680 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FOREMAN, MARQUIS D · 2007 to 2011
$2.4M
Effects &Costs of Massage in Hospice Cancer PatientsR01NR009092 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WILKIE, DIANA J · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Symptom Clusters in the Palliative Care SettingF31NR010048 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI STAPLETON, STEPHEN JAMES · 2007 to 2009
$57k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010048NINR NIH HHS P30 NR010680NINR NIH HHS R01 NR009092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 13-item Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) is a widely used symptom measurement tool, yet a systematic review summarizing the symptom knowledge generated from its use in patients with advanced cancer is nonexistent.

objectivesThis was a systematic review of the research literature in which investigators utilized the SDS as the measure of symptoms in patients with advanced cancer.

methodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science for primary research studies published between 1978 and 2013 that utilized the SDS as the measurement tool in patients with advanced cancer. Nine hundred eighteen documents were found. Applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 21 articles and 2 dissertations were included.

resultsThe majority of investigators utilized descriptive, cross-sectional research designs conducted with convenience samples. Inconsistent reporting of SDS total scores, individual item scores, age ranges and means, gender distributions, cancer types, cancer stages, and psychometric properties made comparisons difficult. Available mean SDS scores ranged from 17.6 to 38.8. Reports of internal consistency ranged from 0.67 to 0.88. Weighted means indicated fatigue to be the most prevalent and distressing symptom. Appetite ranked higher than pain intensity and pain frequency.

conclusionsThe SDS captures the patient's symptom experience in a manner that informs the researcher or clinician about the severity of the respondents' reported symptom distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The SDS is widely used in a variety of cancer diagnoses. The SDS is a tool clinicians can use to assess 11 symptoms experienced by patients with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychometricsSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26252436
PMCPMC4744575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.