SynthesisMedicine2015
Meta-Analysis of Prognostic and Clinical Significance of CD44v6 in Esophageal Cancer.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CD44v6 overexpression related to metastasis and poor prognosis of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- CD44v6: A metastasis-associated biomarker in patients with gastric cancer?: A comprehensive meta-analysis with heterogeneity analysis.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Methionine restriction for cancer therapy: From preclinical studies to clinical trials.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Review
- Peptide-based inhibition of CD44v6 renders liver carcinomas more susceptible to therapeutic intervention.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- LncRNA CCAT2 promotes malignant progression of metastatic gastric cancer through regulating CD44 alternative splicing.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical implications of cancer stem cells in digestive cancers: acquisition of stemness and prognostic impact.Surgery today · 2020Review
- Article
- Enhancing the therapeutic effects of in vitro targeted radionuclide therapy of 3D multicellular tumor spheroids using the novel stapled MDM2/X-p53 antagonist PM2.EJNMMI research · 2020Article
- CD44v6 engages in colorectal cancer progression.Cell death & disease · 2019Review
- Novel role of O-glycosyltransferases GALNT3 and B3GNT3 in the self-renewal of pancreatic cancer stem cells.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- AZIN1 RNA editing confers cancer stemness and enhances oncogenic potential in colorectal cancer.JCI insight · 2018Article
- MicroRNA-34a suppresses invasion and metastatic in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating CD44.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2018Article
- Prognostic value of CD44v6 expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- CD44 drives aggressiveness and chemoresistance of a metastatic human osteosarcoma xenograft model.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD44v6 is a cell adhesion molecule that plays an important role in the development and progression of esophageal cancer. However, the prognostic value and clinical significance of CD44v6 in esophageal cancer remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to clarify these relationships through a meta-analysis.We performed a comprehensive search of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid library database, Google scholar, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases that were published before June 2015. The odds ratio (OR) and pooled hazard ratio (HR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the effects.Twenty-one studies including 1504 patients with esophageal cancer were selected to assess the prognostic value and clinical significance of CD44v6 in these patients. The results showed that the expression of CD44v6 was higher in esophageal cancer tissue than in normal colorectal tissue (OR=9.19, 95% CI=6.30-13.42). Moreover, expression of CD44v6 was higher in patients with lymphoid nodal metastasis, compared to those without (OR=6.91, 95% CI=4.81-9.93). The pooled results showed that CD44v6 was associated with survival in patients with esophageal cancer (HR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.56-3.92). No significant difference in CD44v6 expression was found in patients with different histological types and tumor stages (both P>0.05). Moreover, no publication bias was found among the studies (all P > 0.05).This meta-analysis demonstrates that CD44v6 is associated with the metastasis of esophageal cancer and a poor prognosis, but is not associated with the histological types and tumor stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.