Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26251832›Full record

ReviewClinical nutrition research2015

Nutritional Management of Kidney Stones (Nephrolithiasis).

Haewook Han, Adam M Segal, Julian L Seifter, Johanna T Dwyer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical nutrition research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect ofNutrients · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of diet on renal stone formation.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Diet-induced hyperoxaluria: A case based mini-review.Clinical nephrology. Case studies · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haewook HanDepartment of Nephrology, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associate, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Adam M SegalHarvard Vanguard Medical Associate, Clinical Instructor at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Julian L SeifterHarvard Vanguard Medical Associates; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Johanna T DwyerTufts University Friedman School of Nutrition and School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates · USHarvard University · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of kidney stones is common in the United States and treatments for them are very costly. This review article provides information about epidemiology, mechanism, diagnosis, and pathophysiology of kidney stone formation, and methods for the evaluation of stone risks for new and follow-up patients. Adequate evaluation and management can prevent recurrence of stones. Kidney stone prevention should be individualized in both its medical and dietary management, keeping in mind the specific risks involved for each type of stones. Recognition of these risk factors and development of long-term management strategies for dealing with them are the most effective ways to prevent recurrence of kidney stones.

Indexed as

Calcium oxalateHypercalciuriaHyperoxaluriaNephrolithiasisPrevention of kidney stoneRisk factors for kidney stonesUric acid stone

Identifiers

PMID26251832
PMCPMC4525130
OpenAlexW1953832888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.