Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26251780›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

The impact of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care on the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with early stage breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Eva Culakova, Marek S Poniewierski, Debra A Wolff, David C Dale, Jeffrey Crawford, Gary H Lyman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validation of theDiscover oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva CulakovaFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA.
Marek S PoniewierskiFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA.
Debra A WolffEmpire State College, Saratoga Springs, NY USA.
David C DaleUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Jeffrey CrawfordDuke University, Durham, NC USA.
Gary H LymanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA ; University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USDuke University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFebrile neutropenia (FN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy resulting in considerable morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study evaluated the time course of neutropenic events and patterns of supportive care interventions in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer treated in oncology community practices.

methodsA prospective cohort study of adult cancer patients initiating a new chemotherapy regimen was conducted at 115 US sites. Toxicity associated with chemotherapy including neutropenic and infectious complications was recorded over four cycles. Clinical interventions were recorded including reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity and use of supportive care measures.

resultsA total of 1,202 patients with stage I-III breast cancer were evaluated. The majority of neutropenic (116 of 196) and infection events (179 of 325) occurred in the initial cycle. A decrease in occurrence of FN and infection was observed in the subsequent cycles, along with an increase in utilization of colony stimulating factors (CSFs), antibiotics and reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity. The overall risk of FN in all patients was 16.3%. In patients who started treatment at or near full dose intensity, the FN risk reached 21.0% without primary CSF prophylaxis and it was 9.0% with prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in FN rates by menopausal or hormone receptors status.

conclusionsThe risk of neutropenic complications is greatest in the initial cycle when most patients receive full-dose chemotherapy. A decrease in neutropenic events during subsequent cycles is associated with reduced dose intensity or increased use of supportive care measures. However, the cumulative risk of FN remains high in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving full dose chemotherapy without prophylactic measures.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyInfectionToxicity neutropenia

Identifiers

PMID26251780
PMCPMC4524886
OpenAlexW1935540772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.