ArticleClinical kidney journal2015
Kinetics of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in haemodialysis patients treated with monthly oral cholecalciferol.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholecalciferol and muscle strength in hemodialysis patients: results from the randomized VITADIAL trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe previously reported that oral cholecalciferol (CCF) (100 000 IU) taken monthly by haemodialysis patients is effective in accomplishing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-D) levels >75 nmol/L in >80% of cases. We aimed to study the weekly kinetecs of serum 25-D in HD patients receiving oral CCF during the first 6 months of HD.
methodsAll new HD patients at our dialysis centre during the autumn months of 2011-2014 were offered entry into the study if their baseline serum 25-D level was <75 nmol/L. Oral CCF (100 000 IU) was administrated monthly during an HD session. The kinetic study included weekly serum sampling for 16 weeks, and every other week thereafter. Biological and treatment data were compared between baseline and 6 months after starting HD and CCF. Patients who required calcimimetics, calcitriol and analogues were excluded from the study.
resultsThe data from 21 patients were available for analysis. These patients had a mean age of 72.2 ± 12 years, 33% were women, 28.5% had diabetes, and 33% had a central venous catheter. Serum 25-D levels increased from 26.8 ± 13 nmol/L at baseline to 102.3 ± 24 nmol/L after 6 months (P < 0.001). Serum calcium and albumin levels both increased during the study period. Serum phosphate level did not change significantly, and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level decreased. Serum 25-D level reached a plateau after 11 weeks of oral CCF. Two patients (9.5%) with low baseline 25-D values, had a stable 25-D level <75 nmol/L after 6 months. No peak effect was observed 48 h after the first dose of CCF.
conclusionThe oral administration of 100 000 IU CCF once a month maintains a normal serum level in 90% of HD patients. Serum 25-D level reaches a plateau level after 12 weeks of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.