Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26251431›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Bone-Subtracted Spinal CT Angiography Using Nonrigid Registration for Better Visualization of Arterial Feeders in Spinal Arteriovenous Fistulas.

T Nishii, A K Kono, M Nishio, N Negi, A Fujita, E Kohmura, K Sugimura

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

T NishiiFrom the Departments of Radiology (T.N., A.K.K., M.N., K.S.) ttsynishii@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-2181
A K KonoFrom the Departments of Radiology (T.N., A.K.K., M.N., K.S.).
M NishioFrom the Departments of Radiology (T.N., A.K.K., M.N., K.S.).
N NegiDivision of Radiology (N.N.), Center for Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
A FujitaNeurosurgery (A.F., E.K.), Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
E KohmuraNeurosurgery (A.F., E.K.), Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
K SugimuraFrom the Departments of Radiology (T.N., A.K.K., M.N., K.S.).
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOKobe University · JPKobe University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePretreatment diagnosis for the location of shunts and arterial feeders of spinal arteriovenous fistulas is crucial. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of subtracted CT angiography imaging by using nonrigid registration (R-CTA) in patients with spinal arteriovenous fistulas compared with conventional CTA imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe records of 15 consecutive subjects (mean age, 65 years; 2 women) who had undergone CTA and digital subtraction angiography for clinically suspected spinal arteriovenous fistula were reviewed. From CTA images obtained at the arterial and late arterial phases, warped images of the late arterial phase were obtained by using nonrigid registration that was adjusted to the arterial phase images. R-CTA images were then obtained by subtracting the warped images from the arterial phase images. The accuracies of using nonrigid registration and conventional spinal CTA and the time required for detecting arterial feeders in spinal arteriovenous fistulas were analyzed for each patient with DSA results as a standard reference. The difference between R-CTA and conventional spinal CTA was assessed by the Welch test and the McNemar χ(2) test.

resultsR-CTA had a higher accuracy compared with conventional spinal CTA (80% versus 47%, P = .025). The time for interpretation was reduced in R-CTA compared with conventional spinal CTA (45.1 versus 97.1 seconds, P = .002).

conclusionsOur subtracted CTA imaging by using nonrigid registration detects feeders of spinal arteriovenous fistulas more accurately and quickly than conventional CTA.

Indexed as

AgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionArteriesArteriovenous FistulaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal CordTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26251431
PMCPMC7964262
OpenAlexW1930294005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.