ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2015
Correlation between the ABC classification and radiological findings for assessing gastric cancer risk.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric Cancer Screening in Japan: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Usefulness and Limitations of a Serum Screening System to Predict the Risk of Gastric Cancer.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Detection of gastritis by a deep convolutional neural network from double-contrast upper gastrointestinal barium X-ray radiography.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Risk factors for atrophic gastritis in the Japanese young and middle-aged: a study using double-contrast upper gastrointestinal barium X-ray radiography.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
- Preliminary study of automatic gastric cancer risk classification from photofluorography.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Article
- Characteristics of gastric cancer in negative test of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen test: a multicenter study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017Article
- Association between Gastric Cancer Risk and SerumGastroenterology research and practice · 2017Article
- Association between Increased Gastric Juice Acidity and Sliding Hiatal Hernia Development in Humans.PloS one · 2017Article
- Correlation Between Expression of the Cancer/Testis Antigen KK-LC-1 andIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the correlation between ABC risk assessment and radiological findings of gastric mucosa and to propose an improved method for gastric cancer screening. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe evaluated 318 participants with Helicobacter pylori (Hp) antibody titers, serum pepsinogen (PG) and upper GI radiography and then classified them into three groups: A, double-negative; B, Hp-positive, PG-negative; C, PG-positive. Group A was subclassified as: A-1, Hp antibody titer <3.0 U/ml; A-2, Hp antibody titer ≥3.0 U/ml. Results for group A and non-A (B or C) participants and radiological findings of gastric mucosa (fold and area gastricae) were analyzed retrospectively.
resultsRadiological findings differed significantly between the 207 A-1 and 98 non-A group. Odds ratios were 17.72 for fold distribution, 10.63 for fold thickness, 6.10 for fold characteristics, and 10.62 for area gastricae. Presence of ≥2 risk factors offered 90.3 % sensitivity, 94.7 % specificity, and 93.3 % accuracy. Nine (69.2 %) of the 13 A-2 group participants and 11 (5.3 %) A-1 group participants had a risk for gastric cancer according to radiological findings.
conclusionA good correlation exists between ABC classifications and radiological findings for gastric cancer risk, but some discrepant cases exist. We recommend both methods as screening for gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.