Trial reportClinical drug investigation2015
Recombinant filgrastim (BK0023) pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple escalating doses in an equivalence study in healthy men.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe new filgrastim formulation, BK0023, whose synthesis method is patented, was tested in a phase I clinical study that was aimed at investigating the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic equivalence and the safety of BK0023 in healthy male subjects.
methodsSingle and multiple escalating doses were administered to healthy male volunteers according to a double-blind, randomised, two-way crossover design. Thirty-two subjects received subcutaneous filgrastim 2.5 µg/kg/day for 7 consecutive days in each period, 36 subjects received 5 µg/kg/day for 7 days in each period, and 22 subjects received 10 µg/kg/day for 5 days. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and CD34+ cell count were measured in whole blood as primary and secondary pharmacodynamic parameters. Filgrastim concentrations were measured in serum to calculate the primary pharmacokinetic parameters.
resultsThe maximum ANC and the area under the curve of the ANC after the first dose and to the end of treatment satisfied the equivalence criterion (95 % confidence intervals within 85-115 or 85-117 % in case of log-transformation). At all three dose regimens, BK0023 was also bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of pharmacokinetic profile of serum filgrastim. The frequency of the treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments, with the most frequent untoward effects being back and bone pain.
conclusionsEquivalence could be established using both the baseline-adjusted values and the original unadjusted values. The tested formulation at all three dose regimens was also bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of pharmacokinetic profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.