Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26250911›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2015

Erythropoietin and Neonatal Neuroprotection.

Sandra E Juul, Gillian C Pet

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Latest Evidence of Erythropoietin in the Treatment of Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra E JuulDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195-6320, USA. Electronic address: sjuul@uw.edu.
Gillian C PetDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195-6320, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Preterm Epo Neuroprotection Trial (PENUT Trial) CCCU01NS077953 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JUUL, SANDRA E · 2013 to 2018
$10.7M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Biomarkers of Neonatal Encephalopathy in a Nonhuman Primate ModelR01HD073128 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JUUL, SANDRA E · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073128NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIH HHS P51 OD010425NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS077953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain groups of neonates are at high risk of developing long-term neurodevelopmental impairment and might be considered candidates for neuroprotective interventions. This article explores some of these high-risk groups, relevant mechanisms of brain injury, and specific mechanisms of cellular injury and death. The potential of erythropoietin (Epo) to act as a neuroprotective agent for neonatal brain injury is discussed. Clinical trials of Epo neuroprotection in preterm and term infants are updated.

Indexed as

NeuroprotectionErythropoietinHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, NewbornErythropoietinApoptosisAutophagyBrain injuryErythropoietinExtreme prematurityHypoxic ischemic encephalopathyNecrosis

Identifiers

PMID26250911
PMCPMC4529536
OpenAlexW1710099985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.