Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26250700›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2015

Airway management by physician-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Services - a prospective, multicentre, observational study of 2,327 patients.

Geir Arne Sunde, Jon-Kenneth Heltne, David Lockey, Brian Burns, Mårten Sandberg, Knut Fredriksen, Karl Ove Hufthammer, Akos Soti, Richard Lyon, Helena Jäntti and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01502111 (Improved Knowledge Through Better Data, Implementing and Evaluating a Novel Consensus-based Template for Uniform Reporting of Data From Pre-hospital Airway Management - a Prospective Multicentre Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01502111 completednot on this map

Improved Knowledge Through Better Data, Implementing and Evaluating a Novel Consensus-based Template for Uniform Reporting of Data From Pre-hospital Airway Management - a Prospective Multicentre Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNorwegian Air Ambulance FoundationRan2012 to 2013Enrolled2,333ConditionsTrauma, Cardiac Arrest, Emergencies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Efficacy of endotracheal intubation in helicopter cabin vs. ground: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Airway management skills and devices on Italian helicopter emergency medical service: a national survey.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Geir Arne SundeNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. geir.arne.sunde@norskluftambulanse.no.
Jon-Kenneth HeltneDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. jkhe@helse-bergen.no.
David LockeyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. david.lockey@nbt.nhs.uk.
Brian BurnsSydney HEMS, Ambulance Service of NSW, Sydney, Australia. bburns_2000@yahoo.com.
Mårten SandbergAir Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. marten.sandberg@medisin.uio.no.
Knut FredriksenUiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Knut.Fredriksen@unn.no.
Karl Ove HufthammerCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. karl.ove.hufthammer@helse-bergen.no.
Akos SotiHungarian Air Ambulance Nonprofit Ltd., Budaors, Hungary. akossoti@gmail.com.
Richard LyonEmergency Medicine Research Group, Edinburgh, UK. richardl@kssairambulance.org.uk.
Helena JänttiCentre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. Helena.Jantti@kuh.fi.
Antti KämäräinenEmergency Medical Services, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. Antti.Kamarainen@pshp.fi.
Bjørn Ole ReidDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. bjorn.ole.reid@stolav.no.
Tom SilfvastEmergency Medical Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Tom.Silfvast@hus.fi.
Falko HarmDepartment for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Falko.Harm@usb.ch.
Stephen J M SollidNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. stephen.sollid@norskluftambulanse.no.
Airport Study Group
Oslo University Hospital · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOKuopio University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIHungarian National Blood Transfusion Service · HUNSW Ambulance · AUSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite numerous studies on prehospital airway management, results are difficult to compare due to inconsistent or heterogeneous data. The objective of this study was to assess advanced airway management from international physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services.

methodsWe collected airway data from 21 helicopter emergency medical services in Australia, England, Finland, Hungary, Norway and Switzerland over a 12-month period. A uniform Utstein-style airway template was used for collecting data.

resultsThe participating services attended 14,703 patients on primary missions during the study period, and 2,327 (16 %) required advanced prehospital airway interventions. Of these, tracheal intubation was attempted in 92 % of the cases. The rest were managed with supraglottic airway devices (5 %), bag-valve-mask ventilation (2 %) or continuous positive airway pressure (0.2 %). Intubation failure rates were 14.5 % (first-attempt) and 1.2 % (overall). Cardiac arrest patients showed significantly higher first-attempt intubation failure rates (odds ratio: 2.0; 95 % CI: 1.5-2.6; p < 0.001) compared to non-cardiac arrest patients. Complications were recorded in 13 %, with recognised oesophageal intubation being the most frequent (25 % of all patients with complications). For non-cardiac arrest patients, important risk predictors for first-attempt failure were patient age (a non-linear association) and administration of sedatives (reduced failure risk). The patient's sex, provider's intubation experience, trauma type (patient category), indication for airway intervention and use of neuromuscular blocking agents were not risk factors for first-attempt intubation failure.

conclusionsAdvanced airway management in physician-staffed prehospital services was performed frequently, with high intubation success rates and low complication rates overall. However, cardiac arrest patients showed significantly higher first-attempt failure rates compared to non-cardiac arrest patients. All failed intubations were handled successfully with a rescue device or surgical airway.

trial registrationSTUDY REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01502111 . Registered 22 December 2011.

Indexed as

AircraftAirway ManagementEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceIntubation, IntratrachealMaleProspective StudiesRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID26250700
PMCPMC4528299
OpenAlexW2140620387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.