ReviewPlanta2015
Synthetic promoters in planta.
Review in Planta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Dissection of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Identification of a cytokinin-responsive core promoter and interacting transcription factors of MtCKX1 in Medicago truncatula.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Characterization ofInsects · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Advances in promoter engineering strategies for enhanced recombinant protein expression in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Promoters, KeyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Artificially designed synthetic promoter for a high level of salt induction using a cis-engineering approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novel synthetic inducible promoters controlling gene expression during water-deficit stress with green tissue specificity in transgenic poplar.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Analysis of plant pararetrovirus promoter sequence(s) for developing a useful synthetic promoter with enhanced activity in rice, pearl millet, and tobacco plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Design principles for synthetic control systems to engineer plants.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- From qualitative to quantitative: the state of the art and challenges for plant synthetic biology.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Designing artificial synthetic promoters for accurate, smart, and versatile gene expression in plants.Plant communications · 2023Review
- Synthetic dual hormone-responsive promoters enable engineering of plants with broad-spectrum resistance.Plant communications · 2023Article
- Identification of the inducible activity in the promoter of the soybeanPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023Article
- Overexpression of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Plant Promoters and Terminators for High-Precision Bioengineering.Biodesign research · 2023Review
- Major viral diseases in grain legumes: designing disease resistant legumes from plant breeding and OMICS integration.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Further Characterization of MUAS35SCP and FUAS35SCP Recombinant Promoters and Their Implication in Translational Research.Molecular biotechnology · 2022Article
- GB_SynP: A Modular dCas9-Regulated Synthetic Promoter Collection for Fine-Tuned Recombinant Gene Expression in Plants.ACS synthetic biology · 2022Article
- Functional characterization of the pUceS8.3 promoter and its potential use for ectopic gene overexpression.Planta · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThis paper reviews the importance, prospective and development of synthetic promoters reported in planta. A review of the synthetic promoters developed in planta would help researchers utilize the available resources and design new promoters to benefit fundamental research and agricultural applications. The demand for promoters for the improvement and application of transgenic techniques in research and agricultural production is increasing. Native/naturally occurring promoters have some limitations in terms of their induction conditions, transcription efficiency and size. The strength and specificity of native promoter can be tailored by manipulating its 'cis-architecture' by the use of several recombinant DNA technologies. Newly derived chimeric promoters with specific attributes are emerging as an efficient tool for plant molecular biology. In the last three decades, synthetic promoters have been used to regulate plant gene expression. To better understand synthetic promoters, in this article, we reviewed promoter structure, the scope of cis-engineering, strategies for their development, their importance in plant biology and the total number of such promoters (188) developed in planta to date; we then categorized them under different functional regimes as biotic stress-inducible, abiotic stress-inducible, light-responsive, chemical-inducible, hormone-inducible, constitutive and tissue-specific. Furthermore, we identified a set of 36 synthetic promoters that control multiple types of expression in planta. Additionally, we illustrated the differences between native and synthetic promoters and among different synthetic promoter in each group, especially in terms of efficiency and induction conditions. As a prospective of this review, the use of ideal synthetic promoters is one of the prime requirements for generating transgenic plants suitable for promoting sustainable agriculture and plant molecular farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26250538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.