Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26250453›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2015

Symmetric and asymmetric expansion of molars using a Burstone-type transpalatal arch. Biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Michaela Tsetsilas, Anna-Christin Konermann, Ludger Keilig, Susanne Reimann, Andreas Jäger, Christoph Bourauel

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michaela TsetsilasDepartment of Orthodontics, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anna-Christin KonermannDepartment of Orthodontics, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ludger KeiligEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. ludger.keilig@uni-bonn.de.
Susanne ReimannEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas JägerDepartment of Orthodontics, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph BourauelEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA transpalatal arch (TPA) directly connecting the maxillary first molars can be used in passive (for stabilization) and active (for molar or segment movement) modes. Activation may be symmetric or asymmetric. This study was performed to analyze the effectiveness of TPAs for transverse expansion treatment by measuring both the force systems they deliver and the clinical tooth movements thus achieved. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen patients (six with symmetric and four with asymmetric transverse discrepancies) were treated using a TPA made of titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) and fitted with 0.032" × 0.032" Burstone lingual brackets. The force systems exerted by these TPAs and the resultant tooth movements were first simulated and measured inside the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). All TPAs, whether used in the symmetric or asymmetric activation mode, were adjusted to an expansive force of 4 N. After a treatment of 12 weeks, their effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the clinical tooth movements to the movements simulated in the OMSS.

resultsClinically, the symmetric treatments resulted in a mean correction of 4.5 ± 1.0 mm and a mean of buccal crown tipping of 10.1°, compared to 9.6° for the movements simulated in the OMSS. The four cases of unilateral crossbite were treated with an asymmetrically activated TPA (including a force on one side and a combination of force and negative torque on the other side). The intended unilateral expansion was achieved in all four cases. Vertical side effects were acceptably small in both the symmetric and the asymmetric treatment cases. The tooth movements could be implemented as planned in all 10 patients, whereby in 5 patients complete correction of the occlusal width discrepancy was achieved by the end of the 12-week treatment.

conclusionGiven this combination of good efficacy and minor side effects, the TMA/TPA appliance may be recommended as a suitable approach to correct transverse discrepancies. Recommendations expressed in previous studies for the use of Burstone-type TMA/TPA in these situations is confirmed by our study.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildDental Stress AnalysisEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusionMolarOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodontic AppliancesPalatal Expansion TechniqueStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthBiomechanicsCrossbiteMalocclusionTranspalatal archTransverse discrepancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.