Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26250443›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.

Fang Yu, Ming-Hui Chen, Lynn Kuo, Heather Talbott, John S Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fang YuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 68198-4350, NE, USA. fangyu@unmc.edu.
Ming-Hui ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269-4120, CT, USA. ming-hui.chen@uconn.edu.
Lynn KuoDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269-4120, CT, USA. lynn.kuo@uconn.edu.
Heather TalbottDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 68198-5870, NE, USA. heather.talbott@unmc.edu.
John S DavisVA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 68198-3255, NE, USA. jsdavis@unmc.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Bayesian Approaches to Model Selection for Survival DataR01GM070335 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2003 to 2019
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIGMS NIH HHS GM 70335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the Bayesian method becomes more popular for analyzing high dimensional gene expression data as it allows us to borrow information across different genes and provides powerful estimators for evaluating gene expression levels. It is crucial to develop a simple but efficient gene selection algorithm for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes based on the Bayesian estimators.

resultsIn this paper, by extending the two-criterion idea of Chen et al. (Chen M-H, Ibrahim JG, Chi Y-Y. A new class of mixture models for differential gene expression in DNA microarray data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2008;138:387-404), we propose two new gene selection algorithms for general Bayesian models and name these new methods as the confident difference criterion methods. One is based on the standardized differences between two mean expression values among genes; the other adds the differences between two variances to it. The proposed confident difference criterion methods first evaluate the posterior probability of a gene having different gene expressions between competitive samples and then declare a gene to be DE if the posterior probability is large. The theoretical connection between the proposed first method based on the means and the Bayes factor approach proposed by Yu et al. (Yu F, Chen M-H, Kuo L. Detecting differentially expressed genes using alibrated Bayes factors. Statistica Sinica. 2008;18:783-802) is established under the normal-normal-model with equal variances between two samples. The empirical performance of the proposed methods is examined and compared to those of several existing methods via several simulations. The results from these simulation studies show that the proposed confident difference criterion methods outperform the existing methods when comparing gene expressions across different conditions for both microarray studies and sequence-based high-throughput studies. A real dataset is used to further demonstrate the proposed methodology. In the real data application, the confident difference criterion methods successfully identified more clinically important DE genes than the other methods.

conclusionThe confident difference criterion method proposed in this paper provides a new efficient approach for both microarray studies and sequence-based high-throughput studies to identify differentially expressed genes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremGene Regulatory NetworksDinoprostGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionTime FactorsDinoprost

Identifiers

PMID26250443
PMCPMC4527130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.