Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26250159›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Perceived barriers to reporting adverse drug events in hospitals: a qualitative study using theoretical domains framework approach.

Fariba Mirbaha, Gloria Shalviri, Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Kheirollah Gholami, Reza Majdzadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Self-Learning about Herbal and Dietary Supplements: Perspectives Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fariba MirbahaKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 1547 North Karegar St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran. faribamirbaha@yahoo.com.
Gloria ShalviriKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 1547 North Karegar St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran. shalviri_g@yahoo.com.
Bahareh YazdizadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 1547 North Karegar St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran. byazdizadeh@tums.ac.ir.
Kheirollah GholamiResearch Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 92, Karimkhane Zand Street, 1584775311, Tehran, Iran. khgholami@tums.ac.ir.
Reza MajdzadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rezamajd@tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug events (ADEs) are a major source of morbidity and mortality, estimated as the forth to sixth cause of annual deaths in the USA. Spontaneous reporting of suspected ADEs by health care professionals to a national pharmacovigilance system is recognized as a useful method to detect and reduce harm from medicines; however, underreporting is a major drawback. Understanding the barriers to ADE reporting and thereafter design of interventions to increase ADE reporting requires a systematic approach and use of theory. Since multiple theories in behavior change exist that may have conceptually overlapping constructs, a group of experts suggested an integrative framework called theoretical domains framework (TDF). This approach considers a set of 12 domains, came from 33 theories and 128 constructs, covering the main factors influencing practitioner behavior and barriers to behavior change. The aim of this study is to apply TDF approach to establish an evidence-based understanding of barriers associated with ADE reporting among nurses and pharmacists.

methodsA total of three focus group discussions were conducted; among them two consisted of nurses and one involved pharmacists. Discussions were guided by questions designed based on TDF. Transcriptions of discussions were then thematically analyzed, and detected barriers to reporting ADEs were categorized based on extracted themes.

resultsA total of 34 nurses and pharmacists attended the group discussions. Six domains were identified to be relevant to barriers of ADE reporting in hospitals. These domains included "Knowledge," "Skills," "Beliefs about consequences," "Motivation and goals (intention)," "Social influences (norms)," and "Environmental constraints." We detected several barriers to ADE reporting, such as lack of knowledge of what should be reported, fear of punishment and criticism, lack of time, lack of teamwork, and lack of active support by hospital managements and other colleagues. Based on detected barriers, "Cognitive and behavioral factors," "Motivational factors and teamwork," in addition to "Organizational processes and resources" could be targeted in designing appropriate interventions.

conclusionsDetection of barriers to reporting ADEs is necessary to design appropriate interventions. The TDF is a comprehensive approach that enables us to better understand barriers to behavior change in reporting ADEs.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFocus GroupsHospitalsHumansIntentionIranMotivationPersonnel, HospitalQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26250159
PMCPMC4528309
OpenAlexW2109655984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.