Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26249725›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2016

Acceptability of a Touch Screen Tablet Psychosocial Survey Administered to Radiation Therapy Patients in Japan.

Eiji Suzuki, Lisa Mackenzie, Robert Sanson-Fisher, Mariko Carey, Catherine D'Este, Hiromi Asada, Masakazu Toi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eiji SuzukiBreast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Lisa MackenziePriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, W4, Hunter Medical Research Institute Building, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. lisa.mackenzie@uon.edu.au.
Robert Sanson-FisherPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, W4, Hunter Medical Research Institute Building, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Mariko CareyPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, W4, Hunter Medical Research Institute Building, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Catherine D'EsteNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Newcastle, Australia.
Hiromi AsadaDepartment of Nursing, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Masakazu ToiBreast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University Hospital · JPHunter Medical Research Institute · AUAustralian National University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies in western clinical settings suggest that touch screen computer surveys are an acceptable mode of collecting information about cancer patients' wellbeing PURPOSE: We examined the acceptability of a touch screen tablet survey among cancer patients in Japan.

methodsEligible patients (n = 262) attending a university hospital radiation therapy (RT) department were invited to complete a touch screen tablet survey about psychosocial communication and care. Survey consent and completion rates, the proportion and characteristics of patients who completed the touch screen survey unassisted, and patient-reported acceptability were assessed.

resultsOf 158 consenting patients (consent rate 60 % [95 % CI 54, 66 %] of eligible patients), 152 completed the touch screen computer survey (completion rate 58 % [95 % CI 52, 64 %] of eligible patients). The survey was completed without assistance by 74 % (n = 113; 95 % CI 67, 81 %) of respondents. Older age was associated with higher odds of having assistance with survey completion (OR 1.09; 95 % CI 1.04, 1.14 %). Ninety-two percent of patients (95 % CI 86, 96 %) felt that the touch screen survey was easy to use and 95 % (95 % CI 90, 98 %) agreed or strongly agreed that they were comfortable answering the questions. Overall, 65 % (95 % CI 57, 73 %) of respondents would be willing to complete such a survey more than once while waiting for RT treatment.

conclusionsAlthough patient self-reported acceptability of the touch screen survey was high, self-administered touch screen tablet surveys may not be entirely appropriate for older cancer patients or possibly for patients with lower educational attainment.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSelf ReportAge factorsCancerHandheld computersJapanPatient preferenceSurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID26249725
OpenAlexW2220036223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.