ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2015
Surgery versus SABR for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017Guideline
- Surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: prospective clinical trials of the past, the present, and the future.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Review
- Surgery compared to stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: better, equivalent or worse?Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- Salvage surgery after high-dose radiotherapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Review
- Stage I lung cancer-to operate or to radiate? that is the question.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26248838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.