Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248653›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Phase II evaluation of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of hot flashes.

Kunal C Kadakia, Charles L Loprinzi, Pamela J Atherton, Kelliann C Fee-Schroeder, Amit Sood, Debra L Barton

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring symptoms and toxicities: a 35-year experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kunal C KadakiaDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. kkadakia@umich.edu.
Charles L LoprinziDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. cloprinzi@mayo.edu.
Pamela J AthertonDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. atherton.pamela@mayo.edu.
Kelliann C Fee-SchroederDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. feeschroeder.kelliann@mayo.edu.
Amit SoodDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. Sood.Amit@mayo.edu.
Debra L BartonSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 2153, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. debbartn@umich.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

SUPPLEMENTU10CA037404 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOPRINZI, CHARLES L · 1985 to 2014
$34.8M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHot flashes are a significant source of symptom burden that negatively impacts quality of life (QOL). For women who have contraindications to, or are unwilling to consider, estrogens or antidepressants for bothersome hot flashes, there are limited effective pharmacologic or complementary and alternative medicines.

methodsThis single-arm phase II trial studied the efficacy of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of hot flashes. Eligible women were required to have reported ≥14 hot flashes per week for ≥1 month. The patients were treated with SAMe at a dose of 400 mg twice daily to evaluate whether a reduction in hot flash score appeared to be better than the historical placebo response of approximately 25%. The women kept a daily hot flash diary during a baseline week and then daily during weeks 2-7. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 7 in hot flash score and hot flash frequency. Secondary endpoints included toxicity analyses and the effect of SAMe on QOL.

resultsFrom October 28, 2010 to January 30, 2012, 43 women were treated with SAMe. The decrease in mean percent of baseline hot flash score and frequency was 35.4 and 32.6%, respectively. When compared to the historical placebo response of 25%, the effect of SAMe on hot flash score was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Treatment was well tolerated with expected grade 1/2 gastrointestinal toxicity and no negative effect on QOL.

conclusionsThe use of SAMe does not appear to significantly reduce hot flashes more than would be expected with a placebo.

Indexed as

FemaleHot FlashesHumansQuality of LifeS-AdenosylmethionineS-AdenosylmethionineClinical trialsHot flashesQuality of lifeS-Adenosyl-L-methionineSAMe

Identifiers

PMID26248653
PMCPMC4973573
OpenAlexW1066690535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.