Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248608›Full record

ArticleProteins2015

Large oligomeric complex structures can be computationally assembled by efficiently combining docked interfaces.

Matthias Dietzen, Olga V Kalinina, Katerina Taškova, Benny Kneissl, Anna-Katharina Hildebrandt, Elmar Jaenicke, Heinz Decker, Thomas Lengauer, Andreas Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthias DietzenMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Campus E1 4, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Olga V KalininaMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Campus E1 4, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Katerina TaškovaInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Staudingerweg 9, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Benny KneisslInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Staudingerweg 9, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Anna-Katharina HildebrandtCenter for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Campus E2 1, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Elmar JaenickeInstitute of Molecular Biophysics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Jakob-Welder-Weg 26, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Heinz DeckerInstitute of Molecular Biophysics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Jakob-Welder-Weg 26, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Thomas LengauerMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Campus E1 4, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Andreas HildebrandtInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Staudingerweg 9, Mainz, 55128, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macromolecular oligomeric assemblies are involved in many biochemical processes of living organisms. The benefits of such assemblies in crowded cellular environments include increased reaction rates, efficient feedback regulation, cooperativity and protective functions. However, an atom-level structural determination of large assemblies is challenging due to the size of the complex and the difference in binding affinities of the involved proteins. In this study, we propose a novel combinatorial greedy algorithm for assembling large oligomeric complexes from information on the approximate position of interaction interfaces of pairs of monomers in the complex. Prior information on complex symmetry is not required but rather the symmetry is inferred during assembly. We implement an efficient geometric score, the transformation match score, that bypasses the model ranking problems of state-of-the-art scoring functions by scoring the similarity between the inferred dimers of the same monomer simultaneously with different binding partners in a (sub)complex with a set of pregenerated docking poses. We compiled a diverse benchmark set of 308 homo and heteromeric complexes containing 6 to 60 monomers. To explore the applicability of the method, we considered 48 sets of parameters and selected those three sets of parameters, for which the algorithm can correctly reconstruct the maximum number, namely 252 complexes (81.8%) in, at least one of the respective three runs. The crossvalidation coverage, that is, the mean fraction of correctly reconstructed benchmark complexes during crossvalidation, was 78.1%, which demonstrates the ability of the presented method to correctly reconstruct topology of a large variety of biological complexes.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAlgorithmsComputational BiologyMacromolecular SubstancesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareMacromolecular SubstancesProteins3D-MOSAICcomplex match scoremacromolecular assemblyprotein-protein interactionsstructural modelingtransformation match score

Identifiers

PMID26248608
PMCPMC5049452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.