Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248599›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2016

Cortical Stimulation Concurrent With Skilled Motor Training Improves Forelimb Function and Enhances Motor Cortical Reorganization Following Controlled Cortical Impact.

Stephanie C Jefferson, Elyse Renee Clayton, Nicole A Donlan, Dorothy Annette Kozlowski, Theresa A Jones, DeAnna Lynn Adkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intra- and interregional coregulation of opioid genes: broken symmetry in spinal circuits.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Enhancing Rehabilitative Therapies with Vagus Nerve Stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie C JeffersonDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Elyse Renee ClaytonDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Nicole A DonlanDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Dorothy Annette KozlowskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theresa A JonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
DeAnna Lynn AdkinsDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA adkinsdl@musc.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USMedical University of South Carolina · USDePaul University · US

Funding

Cortical Stimulation to Enhance Motor Recovery Following Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS065866 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ADKINS, DEANNA L · 2011 to 2015
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS NINDS NS065866NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical and magnetic brain stimulation can improve motor function following stroke in humans, rats, and nonhuman primates, especially when paired with rehabilitative training (RT). Previously, we found in rodent stroke models that epidural electrical cortical stimulation (CS) of the ipsilesional motor cortex (MC) combined with motor RT enhances motor function and motor cortical plasticity. It was unknown whether CS following experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) would have similar effects.

objectiveTo test the effects of CS combined with motor training after moderate/severe TBI on behavioral outcome and motor cortical organization.

methodsFollowing unilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI) over the caudal forelimb area of the MC in adult male rats, forelimb reach training was administered daily for 9 weeks concurrently with subthreshold, 100-Hz monopolar CS or no-stimulation control procedures. The rate and magnitude of behavioral improvements and changes in forelimb movement representations in the injured MC as revealed by intracortical microstimulation were measured.

resultsCCI resulted in severe motor impairments persisting throughout the 9 weeks of training in both groups, but CS-treated animals had significantly greater behavioral improvements. CS also increased wrist motor cortical representation, one of the main movements used in the training task, when compared with RT alone. However, the overall recovery level was modest, leaving animals still extremely impaired.

conclusionsThese data suggest that CS may be useful for improving rehabilitation efficacy after TBI but also raise the possibility that the CS parameters that are highly effective following stroke are suboptimal after moderate/severe TBI.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalElectric Stimulation TherapyMaleMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityRatsRats, Long-EvansRecovery of FunctionCCIICMSmotor cortexmotor mapplasticityrecoveryTBI

Identifiers

PMID26248599
PMCPMC4732912
OpenAlexW2341411643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.