Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248579›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2015

[Consideration of guidelines, recommendations and quality indicators for treatment of stroke in the dataset "Emergency Department" of DIVI].

M Kulla, M Friess, P D Schellinger, A Harth, O Busse, F Walcher, M Helm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M KullaKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Bundeswehrkrankhaus Ulm - Sektion Notfallmedizin, Akademisches Krankenhaus der Universität Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. mail@kulla.de.
M FriessKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Bundeswehrkrankhaus Ulm - Sektion Notfallmedizin, Akademisches Krankenhaus der Universität Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
P D SchellingerNeurologische Klinik und Neurogeriatrie, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Deutschland.
A HarthKlinik für Neurologie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Akademisches Krankenhaus der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
O BusseDeutsche Schlaganfallgesellschaft und Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurointensiv - und Notfallmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland.
F WalcherKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland.
M HelmKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Bundeswehrkrankhaus Ulm - Sektion Notfallmedizin, Akademisches Krankenhaus der Universität Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dataset "Emergency Department" of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) has been developed during several expert meetings. Its goal is an all-encompassing documentation of the early clinical treatment of patients in emergency departments. Using the example of the index disease acute ischemic stroke (stroke), the aim was to analyze how far this approach has been fulfilled. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study German, European and US American guidelines were used to analyze the extent of coverage of the datasets on current emergency department guidelines and recommendations from professional societies. In addition, it was examined whether the dataset includes recommended quality indicators (QI) for quality management (QM) and in a third step it was examined to what extent national provisions for billing are included. In each case a differentiation was made whether the respective rationale was primary, i.e. directly apparent or whether it was merely secondarily depicted by expertise. In the evaluation an additional differentiation was made between the level of recommendations and further quality relevant criteria.

resultsThe modular design of the emergency department dataset comprising 676 data fields is briefly described. A total of 401 individual fields, divided into basic documentation, monitoring and specific neurological documentation of the treatment of stroke patients were considered. For 247 data fields a rationale was found. Partially overlapping, 78.9 % of 214 medical recommendations in 3 guidelines and 85.8 % of the 106 identified quality indicators were primarily covered. Of the 67 requirements for billing of performance of services, 55.5 % are primarily part of the emergency department dataset. Through appropriate expertise and documentation by a board certified neurologist, the results can be improved to almost 100 %.

conclusionThe index disease stroke illustrates that the emergency department dataset of the DIVI covers medical guidelines, especially 100 % of the German guidelines with a grade of recommendation. All necessary information to document the specialized stroke treatment procedure in the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system is also covered. The dataset is also suitable as a documentation tool of quality management, for example, to participate in the registry of the German Stroke Society (ADSR). Best results are obtained if the dataset is applied by a physician specialized in the treatment of patients with stroke (e.g. board certified neurologist). Finally the results show that changes in medical guidelines and recommendations for quality management as well as billing-relevant content should be implemented in the development of datasets for documentation to avoid duplicate documentation.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicDocumentationEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalEuropeGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansNeurologyQuality Indicators, Health CareStrokeUnited StatesAcute strokeDataset emergency department DIVIDocumentationGuidelinesStroke register

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.