ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2016
Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection.
Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Descriptions of long-term impact from inter-professional ethics communication in groups.Nursing ethics · 2023Article
- Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2021Article
- Engaging Tomorrow's Doctors in Clinical Ethics: Implications for Healthcare Organisations.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2021Article
- Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Falling on deaf ears: a qualitative study on clinical ethical committees in France.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How may clinical ethics committees (CECs) inspire ethical reflection among healthcare professionals? How may they deal with organizational ethics issues? In recent years, Norwegian CECs have attempted different activites that stretch or go beyond the standard trio of education, consultation, and policy work. We studied the novel activities of Norwegian CECs by examining annual reports and interviewing CEC members. Through qualitative analysis we identified nine categories of novel CEC activities, which we describe by way of examples. In light of the findings, we argue that some novel working methods may be well suited to promote ethical reflection among clinicians, and that the CEC may be a suitable venue for discussing issues of organizational ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.