Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248475›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2015

A Pharmacist-Physician Intervention Model Using a Computerized Alert System to Reduce High-Risk Medication Use in Elderly Inpatients.

Karolann Arvisais, Sabrina Bergeron-Wolff, Christine Bouffard, Anne-Sophie Michaud, Josée Bergeron, Louise Mallet, Serge Brazeau, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Nora Bernier-Filion, Luc Lanthier and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Not Available].The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
  8. Protecting Our Elderly Patients from Adverse Drug Reactions.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karolann ArvisaisFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sabrina Bergeron-Wolff
Christine Bouffard
Anne-Sophie Michaud
Josée Bergeron
Louise Mallet
Serge Brazeau
Thomas Joly-Mischlich
Nora Bernier-Filion
Luc Lanthier
Geneviève Ricard
Marie-Claude Rodrigue
Benoit Cossette
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAHealth and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription is a complex challenge facing clinicians caring for elderly inpatients. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use frequently leads to adverse drug events and geriatric syndromes. Strategies to reduce PIM use are thus urgently needed.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess (1) the applicability of a pharmacist-physician intervention model to reduce the use of high-risk medications; and (2) the clinical relevance of the alerts generated by a computerized alert system (CAS).

methodsThe study was conducted in patients aged 65 years or older admitted to a teaching hospital between April and June 2014. In the intervention model, the pharmacist determined the clinical relevance of the Beers criteria-based CAS alerts, analyzed the patient's pharmacotherapy, and developed a geriatric pharmacotherapeutic plan to be discussed with the treating physician. The main outcome was the change rate, defined as the number of patient-days with a change in at least one medication out of the number of patient-days with a pharmacist intervention.

resultsThe CAS identified at least one alert in 200 patient-days, i.e., 4.3% of screened patient-days. In 74.5% of those patient-days, at least one alert was judged to be clinically relevant. The change rate was 77.7%. The most frequent changes were drug discontinuation (42.4%) and dose reduction (29.1%). The inpatient geriatric consultation team was involved in only 24% of the hospitalizations with at least one change in medication.

conclusionThe intervention model reduced high-risk medication use in older inpatients. Most of the vulnerable inpatients identified by CAS alerts would not have otherwise had a geriatric medication review.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansInpatientsMalePharmacistsPhysiciansPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationRisk

Identifiers

PMID26248475
OpenAlexW1090325890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.