Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248375›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Prospective Evaluation of a Model-Based Dosing Regimen for Amikacin in Preterm and Term Neonates in Clinical Practice.

A Smits, R F W De Cock, K Allegaert, S Vanhaesebrouck, M Danhof, C A J Knibbe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04867993 (Amikacin Pharmacokinetics to Optimize Dosing Recommendations and Patho), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04867993 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics to Optimize Dosing Recommendations and Patho(Physiological) Considerations in Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Treated With Hypothermia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SarajevoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsAsphyxia NeonatorumArmsAmikacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates With and Without Congenital Heart Disease.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A SmitsNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium anne.smits@uzleuven.be.
R F W De CockDivision of Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
K AllegaertNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
S VanhaesebrouckNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
M DanhofDivision of Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
C A J KnibbeDivision of Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on a previously derived population pharmacokinetic model, a novel neonatal amikacin dosing regimen was developed. The aim of the current study was to prospectively evaluate this dosing regimen. First, early (before and after second dose) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) observations were evaluated for achieving target trough (<3 mg/liter) and peak (>24 mg/liter) levels. Second, all observed TDM concentrations were compared with model-predicted concentrations, whereby the results of a normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) were considered. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Finally, remaining causes limiting amikacin predictability (i.e., prescription errors and disease characteristics of outliers) were explored. In 579 neonates (median birth body weight, 2,285 [range, 420 to 4,850] g; postnatal age 2 days [range, 1 to 30 days]; gestational age, 34 weeks [range, 24 to 41 weeks]), 90.5% of the observed early peak levels reached 24 mg/liter, and 60.2% of the trough levels were <3 mg/liter (93.4% ≤5 mg/liter). Observations were accurately predicted by the model without bias, which was confirmed by the NPDE. Monte Carlo simulations showed that peak concentrations of >24 mg/liter were reached at steady state in almost all patients. Trough values of <3 mg/liter at steady state were documented in 78% to 100% and 45% to 96% of simulated cases with and without ibuprofen coadministration, respectively; suboptimal trough levels were found in patients with postnatal age <14 days and current weight of >2,000 g. Prospective evaluation of a model-based neonatal amikacin dosing regimen resulted in optimized peak and trough concentrations in almost all patients. Slightly adapted dosing for patient subgroups with suboptimal trough levels was proposed. This model-based approach improves neonatal dosing individualization.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringModels, StatisticalAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBirth WeightCreatinineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMonte Carlo MethodAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID26248375
PMCPMC4576045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.