Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248358›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

New Insights Regarding Yeast Survival following Exposure to Liposomal Amphotericin B.

Rita Teixeira-Santos, Elisabete Ricardo, Susana Gomes Guerreiro, Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira, Acácio Gonçalves Rodrigues, Cidália Pina-Vaz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita Teixeira-SantosDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Elisabete RicardoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Susana Gomes GuerreiroCenter of Medical Research (CIM), Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Center for Neurosciences and Cell Biology (CNC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sofia Costa-de-OliveiraDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-6615
Acácio Gonçalves RodriguesDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Burn Unit, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital São João, Porto, Portugal.
Cidália Pina-VazDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Department of Microbiology, Hospital São João, Porto, Portugal cpinavaz@yahoo.com.
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro resistance to amphotericin B is an extremely rare event among pathogenic yeasts. However, in vivo response is sometimes reduced, resulting in an unfavorable outcome. Such adverse outcomes might be related to subfungicidal plasma concentrations. We aimed to clarify the mechanisms of liposomal amphotericin B (AMB-L; AmBisome)-induced lesions and the mechanisms responsible for yeast cell recovery following exposure at plasma concentrations. The physiological statuses developing following exposure to AMB-L at simulated plasma concentrations (20 to 0.1 mg/liter) and at a constant concentration (3 mg/liter) were assessed in a 24-h time course assay. Time-kill experiments also were carried out under the same AMB-L treatment conditions. Our results suggest that yeast cells develop compensatory responses related to membrane polarization, metabolic activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production after exposure to high plasma concentrations (20 to 5 mg/liter) during the first 6 h; in the remaining 18 h, when exposed to lower concentrations, cells reveal almost full recovery with no evidence of fungicidal activity. In contrast, whenever cells are exposed to a constant concentration above the MIC, despite initially exhibiting compensatory stress responses, soon afterwards they exhibit membrane depolarization, a decrease of metabolic activity, increasing ROS production, and lastly, programmed cell death and necrosis, resulting in succumbing to AMB-L fungicidal effects. This study may represent a step forward in the support of AMB-L use for clinical treatment of invasive fungal infections, since it demonstrates the importance of maintaining levels of AMB-L above the MIC in plasma and tissues to ensure it produces its fungicidal effects.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID26248358
PMCPMC4576075
OpenAlexW2127697892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.