ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
New Insights Regarding Yeast Survival following Exposure to Liposomal Amphotericin B.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial activity of a decapeptide againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Physiological Effects Induced by Manuka Honey UponMicroorganisms · 2019Article
- Increasing the Fungicidal Action of Amphotericin B by Inhibiting the Nitric Oxide-Dependent Tolerance Pathway.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2017Article
- Unveiling the Synergistic Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B and Colistin.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro resistance to amphotericin B is an extremely rare event among pathogenic yeasts. However, in vivo response is sometimes reduced, resulting in an unfavorable outcome. Such adverse outcomes might be related to subfungicidal plasma concentrations. We aimed to clarify the mechanisms of liposomal amphotericin B (AMB-L; AmBisome)-induced lesions and the mechanisms responsible for yeast cell recovery following exposure at plasma concentrations. The physiological statuses developing following exposure to AMB-L at simulated plasma concentrations (20 to 0.1 mg/liter) and at a constant concentration (3 mg/liter) were assessed in a 24-h time course assay. Time-kill experiments also were carried out under the same AMB-L treatment conditions. Our results suggest that yeast cells develop compensatory responses related to membrane polarization, metabolic activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production after exposure to high plasma concentrations (20 to 5 mg/liter) during the first 6 h; in the remaining 18 h, when exposed to lower concentrations, cells reveal almost full recovery with no evidence of fungicidal activity. In contrast, whenever cells are exposed to a constant concentration above the MIC, despite initially exhibiting compensatory stress responses, soon afterwards they exhibit membrane depolarization, a decrease of metabolic activity, increasing ROS production, and lastly, programmed cell death and necrosis, resulting in succumbing to AMB-L fungicidal effects. This study may represent a step forward in the support of AMB-L use for clinical treatment of invasive fungal infections, since it demonstrates the importance of maintaining levels of AMB-L above the MIC in plasma and tissues to ensure it produces its fungicidal effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.